Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
1.0k views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

apache spark - How to use transform higher-order function?

It's about transform higher-order function (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23908).

Is there any way to use it as a standard function (in package org.apache.spark.sql.functions._)?

I have an array of strings and I want to apply URI normalization to each of them. For now I did it with an UDF. I just hopped that with spark 2.4.0 I would be able to skip the UDF.

As I see it should be used in selectExpr like df.selectExpr("transform(i, x -> x + 1)") but is it only meant to be used with selectExpr?

Using it this way is there anyway to provide a custom function for the transformation? Is there any way to achieve it or should I resort to using good old UDFs?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Is there anyway to use it as a standard function located in package org.apache.spark.sql.functions._ ?

For now it is intended only for usage with SQL expressions, although if you want to return a Column your use expr:

org.apache.spark.sql.functions._

expr("transform(i, x -> x + 1)"): Column

Using it this way is there anyway to provide a custom function for the transformation?

It is possible to use Scala UDF*:

spark.udf.register("f", (x: Int) => x + 1)

Seq((1, Seq(1, 2, 3))).toDF("id", "xs")
  .withColumn("xsinc", expr("transform(xs, x -> f(x))"))
  .show
+---+---------+---------+
| id|       xs|    xsinc|
+---+---------+---------+
|  1|[1, 2, 3]|[2, 3, 4]|
+---+---------+---------+

although it doesn't seem to provide any real benefits over UDF taking a Seq.


* A partial support for Python UDFs seem to be in place (udfs are recognized, types are correctly derived, and calls are dispatched) as well, but as of 2.4.0 the serialization mechanism seems to be broken (all records are passed to UDF as None):

from typing import Optional
from pyspark.sql.functions import expr

sc.version
'2.4.0'
def f(x: Optional[int]) -> Optional[int]:
    return x + 1 if x is not None else None

spark.udf.register('f', f, "integer")

df = (spark
    .createDataFrame([(1, [1, 2, 3])], ("id", "xs"))
    .withColumn("xsinc", expr("transform(xs, x -> f(x))")))

df.printSchema()
root
 |-- id: long (nullable = true)
 |-- xs: array (nullable = true)
 |    |-- element: long (containsNull = true)
 |-- xsinc: array (nullable = true)
 |    |-- element: integer (containsNull = true)
df.show()
+---+---------+-----+
| id|       xs|xsinc|
+---+---------+-----+
|  1|[1, 2, 3]| [,,]|
+---+---------+-----+

Of course there is no real potential for performance boost here - it dispatches to BasePythonRunner so overhead should be the same as of plain udf.

Related JIRA ticket SPARK-27052 - Using PySpark udf in transform yields NULL values


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...