Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
429 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

windows - Can't get past 2542 Threads in Java on 4GB iMac OSX 10.6.3 Snow Leopard (32bit)

I am running the following program trying to figure out how to configure my JVM to get the maximum number of threads my machine can support. For those that might not know, Snow Leopard ships with Java 6.

I tried starting it with defaults, and the following command lines, I always get the Out of Memory Error at Thread 2542 no matter what the JVM options are set to.

java TestThreadStackSizes 100000
java -Xss1024 TestThreadStackSizes 100000
java -Xmx128m -Xss1024 TestThreadStackSizes 100000
java -Xmx2048m -Xss1024 TestThreadStackSizes 100000
java -Xmx2048m -Xms2048m -Xss1024 TestThreadStackSizes 100000

no matter what I pass it, I get the same results, Out of Memory Error at 2542

public class TestThreadStackSizes
{
    public static void main(final String[] args)
    {
        Thread.currentThread().setUncaughtExceptionHandler(new Thread.UncaughtExceptionHandler() {
            public void uncaughtException(final Thread t, final Throwable e)
            {
                System.err.println(e.getMessage());
                System.exit(1);
            }
        });
        int numThreads = 1000;
        if (args.length == 1)
        {
            numThreads = Integer.parseInt(args[0]);
        }

        for (int i = 0; i < numThreads; i++)
        {
            try
            {
                Thread t = new Thread(new SleeperThread(i));
                t.start();
            }
            catch (final OutOfMemoryError e)
            {
                throw new RuntimeException(String.format("Out of Memory Error on Thread %d", i), e);
            }
        }
    }

    private static class SleeperThread implements Runnable
    {
        private final int i;

        private SleeperThread(final int i)
        {
            this.i = i;
        }

        public void run()
        {
            try
            {
                System.out.format("Thread %d about to sleep
", this.i);
                Thread.sleep(1000 * 60 * 60);
            }
            catch (final InterruptedException e)
            {
                throw new RuntimeException(e);
            }
        }
    }
}

Any ideas on how I can affect these results?

I wrote this program to figure out what a Windows Server 2003 is capable of, because I am getting these out of memory can't create native threads at very low numbers, like a couple of hundred. I need to see what a particular box was capable of with different -Xss parameters, then I run into this arbitrary limit on OSX.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

2542 seems like an arbitrary number:

I shut all programs down except the one terminal window I was running my test from and I got to 2545, that told me it was an arbitrary limit.

To get the number of threads for OSX 10.6.3 you do:

> sysctl kern.num_threads
kern.num_threads: 2560

and

> sysctl kern.num_taskthreads
kern.num_taskthreads: 2560

The 2560 number matches up with the 2542 and 2545 because there are obviously other threads running in the background. According to the official documentation kern.num_taskthreads can not be adjusted in the desktop version of OSX.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...