The export default {...}
construction is just a shortcut for something like this:
const funcs = {
foo() { console.log('foo') },
bar() { console.log('bar') },
baz() { foo(); bar() }
}
export default funcs
It must become obvious now that there are no foo
, bar
or baz
functions in the module's scope. But there is an object named funcs
(though in reality it has no name) that contains these functions as its properties and which will become the module's default export.
So, to fix your code, re-write it without using the shortcut and refer to foo
and bar
as properties of funcs
:
const funcs = {
foo() { console.log('foo') },
bar() { console.log('bar') },
baz() { funcs.foo(); funcs.bar() } // here is the fix
}
export default funcs
Another option is to use this
keyword to refer to funcs
object without having to declare it explicitly, as @pawel has pointed out.
Yet another option (and the one which I generally prefer) is to declare these functions in the module scope. This allows to refer to them directly:
function foo() { console.log('foo') }
function bar() { console.log('bar') }
function baz() { foo(); bar() }
export default {foo, bar, baz}
And if you want the convenience of default export and ability to import items individually, you can also export all functions individually:
// util.js
export function foo() { console.log('foo') }
export function bar() { console.log('bar') }
export function baz() { foo(); bar() }
export default {foo, bar, baz}
// a.js, using default export
import util from './util'
util.foo()
// b.js, using named exports
import {bar} from './util'
bar()
Or, as @loganfsmyth suggested, you can do without default export and just use import?*?as?util?from?'./util'
to get all named exports in one object.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…