Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
510 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

performance - Hashtable in C++?

I usually use C++ stdlib map whenever I need to store some data associated with a specific type of value (a key value - e.g. a string or other object). The stdlib map implementation is based on trees which provides better performance (O(log n)) than the standard array or stdlib vector.

My questions is, do you know of any C++ "standard" hashtable implementation that provides even better performance (O(1))? Something similar to what is available in the Hashtable class from the Java API.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

If you're using C++11, you have access to the <unordered_map> and <unordered_set> headers. These provide classes std::unordered_map and std::unordered_set.

If you're using C++03 with TR1, you have access to the classes std::tr1::unordered_map and std::tr1::unordered_set, using the same headers (unless you're using GCC, in which case the headers are <tr1/unordered_map> and <tr1/unordered_set> instead).

In all cases, there are corresponding unordered_multimap and unordered_multiset types too.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...