java - How to distinguish between null and not provided values for partial updates in Spring Rest Controller

Question

I'm trying to distinguish between null values and not provided values when partially updating an entity with PUT request method in Spring Rest Controller.

Consider the following entity, as an example:

@Entity
private class Person {

    @Id
    @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
    private Long id;

    /* let's assume the following attributes may be null */
    private String firstName;
    private String lastName;

    /* getters and setters ... */
}

My Person repository (Spring Data):

@Repository
public interface PersonRepository extends CrudRepository<Person, Long> {
}

The DTO I use:

private class PersonDTO {
    private String firstName;
    private String lastName;

    /* getters and setters ... */
}

My Spring RestController:

@RestController
@RequestMapping("/api/people")
public class PersonController {

    @Autowired
    private PersonRepository people;

    @Transactional
    @RequestMapping(path = "/{personId}", method = RequestMethod.PUT)
    public ResponseEntity<?> update(
            @PathVariable String personId,
            @RequestBody PersonDTO dto) {

        // get the entity by ID
        Person p = people.findOne(personId); // we assume it exists

        // update ONLY entity attributes that have been defined
        if(/* dto.getFirstName is defined */)
            p.setFirstName = dto.getFirstName;

        if(/* dto.getLastName is defined */)
            p.setLastName = dto.getLastName;

        return ResponseEntity.ok(p);
    }
}

Request with missing property

{"firstName": "John"}

Expected behaviour: update firstName= "John" (leave lastName unchanged).

Request with null property

{"firstName": "John", "lastName": null}

Expected behaviour: update firstName="John" and set lastName=null.

I cannot distinguish between these two cases, sincelastName in the DTO is always set to null by Jackson.

Note: I know that REST best practices (RFC 6902) recommend using PATCH instead of PUT for partial updates, but in my particular scenario I need to use PUT.

Answer 1

Another option is to use java.util.Optional.

import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonInclude;
import java.util.Optional;

@JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
private class PersonDTO {
    private Optional<String> firstName;
    private Optional<String> lastName;
    /* getters and setters ... */
}

If firstName is not set, the value is null, and would be ignored by the @JsonInclude annotation. Otherwise, if implicitly set in the request object, firstName would not be null, but firstName.get() would be. I found this browsing the solution @laffuste linked to a little lower down in a different comment (garretwilson's initial comment saying it didn't work turns out to work).

You can also map the DTO to the Entity with Jackson's ObjectMapper, and it will ignore properties that were not passed in the request object:

import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;

class PersonController {
    // ...
    @Autowired
    ObjectMapper objectMapper

    @Transactional
    @RequestMapping(path = "/{personId}", method = RequestMethod.PUT)
    public ResponseEntity<?> update(
            @PathVariable String personId,
            @RequestBody PersonDTO dto
    ) {
        Person p = people.findOne(personId);
        objectMapper.updateValue(p, dto);
        personRepository.save(p);
        // return ...
    }
}

Validating a DTO using java.util.Optional is a little different as well. It's documented here, but took me a while to find:

// ...
import javax.validation.constraints.NotNull;
import javax.validation.constraints.NotBlank;
import javax.validation.constraints.Pattern;
// ...
private class PersonDTO {
    private Optional<@NotNull String> firstName;
    private Optional<@NotBlank @Pattern(regexp = "...") String> lastName;
    /* getters and setters ... */
}

In this case, firstName may not be set at all, but if set, may not be set to null if PersonDTO is validated.

//...
import javax.validation.Valid;
//...
public ResponseEntity<?> update(
        @PathVariable String personId,
        @RequestBody @Valid PersonDTO dto
) {
    // ...
}

Also might be worth mentioning the use of Optional seems to be highly debated, and as of writing Lombok's maintainer(s) won't support it (see this question for example). This means using lombok.Data/lombok.Setter on a class with Optional fields with constraints doesn't work (it attempts to create setters with the constraints intact), so using @Setter/@Data causes an exception to be thrown as both the setter and the member variable have constraints set. It also seems better form to write the Setter without an Optional parameter, for example:

//...
import lombok.Getter;
//...
@Getter
private class PersonDTO {
    private Optional<@NotNull String> firstName;
    private Optional<@NotBlank @Pattern(regexp = "...") String> lastName;

    public void setFirstName(String firstName) {
        this.firstName = Optional.ofNullable(firstName);
    }
    // etc...
}