.add()
is a mutator method, so the assignment in this line is unnecessary:
startDate = startDate.add(1, 'days');
You can just do this, and have the same effect:
startDate.add(1, 'days');
While it's name would imply the creation of a new Date
object, the toDate()
method really just returns the existing internal Date
object.
So, none of your method calls are creating new Date
or moment
object instances. Fix that by using .clone()
to get a new instance:
startDate = startDate.clone().add(1, 'days');
Or better yet, wrap the values in a call to moment()
as Mtz suggests in a comment, and it will clone the instance, if the value is a moment object, or it will parse the input to create a new moment instance.
startDate = moment(startDate).add(1, 'days');
I think a date enumerator method should not change either of the arguments passed in. I'd create a separate variable for enumerating. I'd also compare the dates directly, rather than comparing strings:
var enumerateDaysBetweenDates = function(startDate, endDate) {
var dates = [];
var currDate = moment(startDate).startOf('day');
var lastDate = moment(endDate).startOf('day');
while(currDate.add(1, 'days').diff(lastDate) < 0) {
console.log(currDate.toDate());
dates.push(currDate.clone().toDate());
}
return dates;
};
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…