Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
200 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

java - Guice module with type parameters

I spent some time wondering if it is possible to write a guice module which itself is parametrized with type T and uses its type parameter to specify bindings.

Like in this (not working) example:

interface A<T> {} 
class AImpl<T> implements A<T>{} 
interface B<T> {} 
class BImpl<T> implements B<T> {} 

class MyModule<T> extends AbstractModule { 
    @Override 
    protected void configure() { 
        bind(new TypeLiteral<A<T>>(){}).to(new TypeLiteral<AImpl<T>>(){});
        bind(new TypeLiteral<B<T>>(){}).to(new TypeLiteral<BImpl<T>>(){}); 
    } 
} 

I tried different approaches passing trying to pass T to MyModule as instance of Class/TypeLiteral but none of them worked. Help appreciated.

Regards, ?ukasz Osipiuk

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

For that you will have to build each TypeLiteral from scratch, using com.google.inject.util.Types. You could do something like that:

class MyModule<T> extends AbstractModule {
    public MyModule(TypeLiteral<T> type) {
        _type = type;
    }

    @Override protected void configure() {
        TypeLiteral<A<T>> a = newGenericType(A.class);
        TypeLiteral<AImpl<T>> aimpl = newGenericType(AImpl.class);
        bind(a).to(aimpl);
        TypeLiteral<B<T>> b = newGenericType(B.class);
        TypeLiteral<BImpl<T>> bimpl = newGenericType(BImpl.class);
        bind(b).to(bimpl);
    }

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    private <V> TypeLiteral<V> newGenericType(Class<?> base) {
        Type newType = Types.newParameterizedType(base, _type.getType());
        return (TypeLiteral<V>) TypeLiteral.get(newType);
    }

    final private TypeLiteral<T> _type;
}

Please note that the private method newGenericType() will perform no control on types, it is your responsibility, in configure(), to make sure that generic types can be correctly built with that method.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

56.9k users

...