Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
138 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

javascript - Caching URL view/state with parameters

I'm making a mobile app using Cordova and AngularJS. Currently I have installed ui-router for routing but I'm open to any other alternative for routing.

My desire: I want to cache certain views bound with parameters. In other words I want to cache paths (or pages).

Example situation: let's say that we see some dashboard page, click on some book cover which redirects to the path book/2. This path is being loaded for the first time into app. Router redirects from HomeController to BooksController (whatever the name). Now the BooksController loads data for given $stateParams (book id = 2) and creates view filled with info about chosen book.

What I want in this situation:

  1. I go back to the dashboard page - it is already loaded (cached?)
  2. I choose book #2 again
  3. Controller or router notices that data about this book is already loaded
  4. The view isn't being recreated, instead it's being fetched from cache

Actually, it would be best to cache everything what I visit based on path. Preloading would be cool too.

Reason: performance. When I open some list of books then I want it to show fast. When view is being created every time, then animation of page change looks awful (it's not smooth).

Any help would be appreciated.

EDIT:

First of all, since I believe it's a common problem for many mobile HTML app programmers, I'd like to precise some information:

  1. I'm not looking for hacks but a clear solution if possible.
  2. Data in the views uses AngularJS, so YES, there are things like ng-bind, ng-repeat and so on.
  3. Caching is needed for both data and DOM elements. As far as I know, browser's layout operation is not as expensive as recreating whole DOM tree. And repaint is not what we can omit.
  4. Having separate controllers is a natural thing. Since I could leave without it I cannot imagine how it would work anyway.

I've got some semi-solutions but I'm gonna be strict about my desire.

Solution 1.

Put all views into one file (I may do it using gulp builder) and use ng-show. That's the simplest solution and I don't believe that anyone knowing AngularJS would not think about it.

A nice trick (from @DmitriZaitsev) is to create a helper function to show/hide element based on current location path.

Advantages:

  1. It's easy.
  2. KIND OF preload feature.

Disadvantages:

  1. all views have to be in a single file. Don't ask why it's not convenient.
  2. Since it's all about mobile devices, sometimes I'd like to "clear" memory. The only way I can think of is to remove those children from DOM. Dirty but ok.
  3. I cannot easily cache /book/2 and /book/3 at the same time. I would have to dynamically create DOM children on top of some templates for each view bound with parameters.

Solution 2.

Use Sticky States AND Future States from ui-router-extras which is awesome.

Advantages:

  1. Separated views.
  2. Very clear usage, very simple since it's just a plugin for ui-router.
  3. Can create dynamic substates. So it would be possible to cache book1, book2 but I'm not sure about book/1 and book/2

Disadvantages:

  1. Again, I'm not sure but I didn't found an example with caching a pair/tuple (view, parameters). Other than that it looks cool.
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

This is precisely the problem I had to solve for my site 33hotels.com. You can check it and play with the tabs "Filter" and "Filter List" (corresponding to different Routes), and see that the View is updated instantly without any delay!

How did I do it? The idea is surprisingly simple - get rid of the Router!

Why? Because the way the Router works is it re-compiles the View upon every single Route change. Yes, Angular does cache the Template but not the compiled View populated with data. Even if data do not change! As the result, when I used the Router in the past, the switch always felt sluggish and non-reactive. Every time I could notice annoying delay, it was a fraction of second but still noticeable.

Now the solution I used? Don't re-compile your Views! Keep them inside your DOM at all times! Then use ng-hide/ng-show to hide/show them depending on the routes:

<div ng-show="routeIs('/dashboard')">
    <-- Your template for Dashboard -->
</div>

<div ng-show="routeIs('/book')">
    <-- Your template for Book -->
</div>

Then create a function routeIs(string) inside your Controller to test if $location.path() matches string, or begins with string as I am using it. That way I still get my View for all pathes like /book/2. Here is the function I am using:

$scope.routeBegins = function () {
    return _.some(arguments, function (string) {
           return 0 === $location.path().indexOf(string);               
    });
};            

So no need to be smart with caching - just keep it in the DOM. It will cache your Views for you!

And the best part is - whenever your data is changed, Angular will instantly update all the Views inside your DOM, even the hidden ones!

Why is this awesome? Because, as user, I don't have to wait for all the parsing and compiling at the moment I want to see the result. I want to click the tab and see my results immediately! Why should the site wait for me to click it and then begin all the re-compiling as I am waiting? Especially when this could be easily done before, during the time my computer is idle.

Is there any downside? The only real one I can think of is loading memory with more DOM elements. However, this actual byte size of my views is negligible, comparing e.g. with all JS, CSS and images.

Another possible but avoidable downside is the re-compilation cost of the hidden views. This is where you can get smart and avoid computation-heavy parts depending on the current routes. Also, you are not re-compiling the whole View, just the parts affected by data changes, which also lowers computational cost.

I find it quite remarkable that everyone is using Routes and seems to be completely unaware (or ignorant) of this problem.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...