I use a method based on this caret position trick:
// Assume r is a range:
var offsetFromBody = Math.abs( r.moveEnd('character', -1000000) );
Since moveEnd returns the number of characters actually moved, offset should now be the offset from the start of the document. This works fine for testing primitive caret movement, but for expanded selections and for getting the exact node that holds the range anchor you'll need something more complex:
// where paramter r is a range:
function getRangeOffsetIE( r ) {
var end = Math.abs( r.duplicate().moveEnd('character', -1000000) );
// find the anchor element's offset
var range = r.duplicate();
r.collapse( false );
var parentElm = range.parentElement();
var children = parentElm.getElementsByTagName('*');
for (var i = children.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
range.moveToElementText( children[i] );
if ( range.inRange(r) ) {
parentElm = children[i];
break;
}
}
range.moveToElementText( parentElm );
return end - Math.abs( range.moveStart('character', -1000000) );
}
This should return the correct caret text offset. Of course, if you know the target node already, or are able to provide a context, then you can skip the whole looping search mess.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…