Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
290 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

java - Is there a way to force the return type of Arrays.asList

I have a method returning a collection of a base class:

import java.util.*;
class Base { }
class Derived extends Base { }

Collection<Base> getCollection()
{
    return Arrays.asList(new Derived(),
                         new Derived());
}

This fails to compile, as the return type of Arrays.asList (List<Derived>) does not match the return type of the method (Collection<Base>). I understand why that happens: since the generic types are different, the two classes are not related by inheritance.

There are many ways to fix the compiler error from changing the return type of the method to not using Arrays.asList to casting one of the derived objects to Base.

Is there a way to tell the compiler to use a different but compatible type when it resolves the generic type for the Arrays.asList call? (I keep trying to use this pattern and running into this problem, so if there is a way to make it work, I would like to know it.)

I thought that you could do something like

Collection<Base> getCollection()
{
    return Arrays.asList<Base>(new Derived(),
                               new Derived());
}

When I try to compile that (java 6), the compiler complains that it is expecting a ')' at the comma.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Your syntax is almost correct; the <Base> goes before the method name:

return Arrays.<Base>asList(new Derived(),
                           new Derived());

Java 8

For Java 8, with its improved target type inference, the explicit type argument is not necessary. Because the return type of the method is Collection<Base>, the type parameter will be inferred as Base.

return Arrays.asList(new Derived(),
                     new Derived());

The explicit type parameter is still necessary for Java 7 and below. You can still supply the explicit type parameter in Java 8; it's optional.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

Just Browsing Browsing

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

56.9k users

...