Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
855 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

algorithm - Why we can not apply counting sort to general arrays?

Counting sort is known with linear time if we know that all elements in the array are upper bounded by a given number. If we take a general array, cant we just scan the array in linear time, to find the maximum value in the array and then to apply counting sort?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

It is not enough to know the upper bound to run a counting sort: you need to have enough memory to fit all the counters.

Consider a situation when you go through an array of 64-bit integers, and find out that the largest element is 2^60. This would mean two things:

  • You need an O(2^60) memory, and
  • It is going to take O(2^60) to complete the sort.

The fact that O(2^60) is the same as O(1) is of little help here, because the constant factor is simply too large. This is very often a problem with pseudo-polynomial time algorithms.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...