Thanks @ima, your answer pointed me in the right direction. I was using an app.config file and it contained this:
<configuration>
<startup>
<supportedRuntime version="v2.0.50727" sku="Client"/>
</startup>
<configSections>
<section name="modules" type="Microsoft.Practices.Composite.Modularity.ModulesConfigurationSection, Microsoft.Practices.Composite"/>
</configSections>
<modules>
<module assemblyFile="Modules/MyNamespace.Modules.ModuleName.dll" moduleType="MyNamespace.Modules.ModuleName.ModuleClass" moduleName="Name"/>
</modules>
</configuration>
It seems the problem was the <startup> element because when I removed it the application ran fine. I was confused because Visual Studio 2008 added that when I checked the box to utilise the "Client Profile" available in 3.5 SP1.
After some mucking about checking and un-checking the box I ended up with a configuration file like this:
<configuration>
<configSections>
<section name="modules" type="Microsoft.Practices.Composite.Modularity.ModulesConfigurationSection, Microsoft.Practices.Composite"/>
</configSections>
<modules>
<module assemblyFile="Modules/MyNamespace.Modules.ModuleName.dll" moduleType="MyNamespace.Modules.ModuleName.ModuleClass" moduleName="Name"/>
</modules>
<startup>
<supportedRuntime version="v2.0.50727" sku="Client"/>
</startup>
</configuration>
Which works!
I'm not sure why the order of elements in the app.config is important - but it seems it is.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…