Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
356 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

tdd - Unit Testing a large method

Following Test-Driven Development that is.

I've recently implemented a algorithm (A*) that required a clean interface. By clean all I want is a couple of properties and a single search method.

What I've found hard is testing the search method. It contains around five steps but I'm essentially forced to code this method in one big go which makes things hard.

Is there any advice for this?

Edit

I'm using C#. No I don't have the code at hand at the moment. My problem relies in the fact a test only passes after implementing the whole search method - rather than a step in the algorithm. I naturally refactored the code after but it was implementing I found hard.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

If your steps are large enough (or are meaningful in their own right) you should consider delegating them to other smaller classes and test the interaction between your class and them. For example if you have a parsing step followed by a sorting step followed by a searching step it could be meaningful to have a parser class, a sorter class, etc. You would then use TDD on each of those.

No idea which language you're using, but if you're in the .net world you could make these classes internal and then expose them to your test class with "internals visible to" which would keep them hidden.

If the steps are small AND meaningless on their own then tvanfosson's suggestions are the way to go.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...