The Apple reference document clearly states
Subsequent messages to the receiver may generate an error indicating that a message was sent to a deallocated object (provided the deallocated memory hasn’t been reused yet).
You never send a dealloc message directly. Instead, an object’s dealloc method is invoked indirectly through the release NSObject protocol method (if the release message results in the receiver's retain count becoming 0). See Memory Management Programming Guide for more details on the use of these methods.
Subclasses must implement their own versions of dealloc to allow the release of any additional memory consumed by the object—such as dynamically allocated storage for data or object instance variables owned by the deallocated object. After performing the class-specific deallocation, the subclass method should incorporate superclass versions of dealloc through a message to super:
Important: Note that when an application terminates, objects may not be sent a dealloc
message since the process’s memory is automatically cleared on exit—it is more efficient
simply to allow the operating system to clean up resources than to invoke all the memory
management methods. For this and other reasons, you should not manage scarce resources in
dealloc
Another SO question iPhone - when is dealloc for a viewcontroller called?
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…