Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
408 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

rdf - Why there is differences in the number of links connected to the same property?

I have noticed that there are a different number of triples using the same property (e.g., isbn) about a Book, but coming from different sources. For instance,

Total http://dbpedia.org/property/isbn links are 20885 while
Total http://dbpedia.org/ontology/isbn links are 21132.

Why do these numbers differ? I want to know which is suitable for good information gain.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Although they have similar names, and represent roughly the same information, the properties are not the same. One is “http://dbpedia.org/property/isbn” and the other is “http://dbpedia.org/ontology/isbn”.

Section 4.3 Infobox Data from the DBpedia wiki says that properties from the http://dbpedia.org/property/ namespace contain raw infobox data and are used in the older Infobox Dataset:

Extracted information is represented using properties in the http://dbpedia.org/property/ namespace. The names of the these properties directly reflect the name of the Wikipedia infobox property. Property names are not cleaned or merged. Property types are not part of a subsumption hierarchy and there is no consistent ontology for the infobox dataset.

It also says that the newer Infobox Ontology uses properties in the http://dbpedia.org/ontology/ namespace:

Properties are represented using properties following the http://dbpedia.org/ontology/{propertyname} naming schema.

While the Infobox Ontology does not contain quite as much information as the Infobox Dataset, the information is much cleaner:

Therefore, the instance data within the infobox ontology is much cleaner and better structured than the Infobox Dataset, but currently doesn't cover all infobox types and infobox properties within Wikipedia.

In this case, however, it looks like there are more triples using the ontology property than the dataset property, so you should get cleaner, more consistent data using http://dbpedia.org/ontology/isbn instead of http://dbpedia.org/property/isbn.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...