Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
1.2k views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

rust - Is there a non-messy way to chain the results of functions that return Option values?

I have some code that looks like this:

f(a).and_then(|b| {
    g(b).and_then(|c| {
        h(c).map(|d| {
            do_something_with(a, b, c, d)
        })
    })
})

Where f, g, and h return Option values. I need to use all the intermediate values (a, b, c, and d) in the do_something_with calculation. The indentation is very deep. Is there a better way to do this? Ideally it would look something like this (which of course doesn't work):

try {
    let b = f(a);
    let c = g(b);
    let d = h(c);
    do_something_with(a, b, c, d)
} rescue NonexistentValueException {
    None
}
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Rust 1.22

The question mark operator now supports Option, so you can write your function as

fn do_something(a: i32) -> Option<i32> {
    let b = f(a)?;
    let c = g(b)?;
    let d = h(c)?;
    do_something_with(a, b, c, d) // wrap in Some(...) if this doesn't return an Option
}

Rust 1.0

The Rust standard library defines a try! macro (and, equivalently, the ? operator, as of Rust 1.13) that solves this problem for Result. The macro looks like this:

macro_rules! try {
    ($expr:expr) => (match $expr {
        $crate::result::Result::Ok(val) => val,
        $crate::result::Result::Err(err) => {
            return $crate::result::Result::Err($crate::convert::From::from(err))
        }
    })
}

If the argument is Err, it returns from the function with that Err value. Otherwise, it evaluates to the value wrapped in Ok. The macro can only be used in a function that returns Result, because it returns the error it meets.

We can make a similar macro for Option:

macro_rules! try_opt {
    ($expr:expr) => (match $expr {
        ::std::option::Option::Some(val) => val,
        ::std::option::Option::None => return None
    })
}

You can then use this macro like this:

fn do_something(a: i32) -> Option<i32> {
    let b = try_opt!(f(a));
    let c = try_opt!(g(b));
    let d = try_opt!(h(c));
    do_something_with(a, b, c, d) // wrap in Some(...) if this doesn't return an Option
}

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...