Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
1.2k views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

haskell - Why do Maybe/Optional types use a Just/Some type instead of the actual type?

In Idris, the Maybe type is defined as followed:

data Maybe a = Just a | Nothing  

It's defined similarly in Haskell:

 data Maybe a = Just a | Nothing
     deriving (Eq, Ord)

Here's the ML version:

datatype 'a option = NONE | SOME of 'a

What are the benefits of using Just and Some?
Why not define the type without them?

example:

data Maybe a = a | Nothing
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

What would then be the difference between

Maybe a

and

Maybe (Maybe a)

?

There's supposed to be a difference between Nothing and Just Nothing.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...