From what I can tell from some informal experimenting while answering your other question, the "word_separators"
setting seems to primarily relevant when double-clicking to select words. For example, I have the following words in a file:
and my word_separators
list is ./\()"'-:,;<>~!@#%^&*|+=[]{}`~?$
, so it includes -
and /
but not _
. If I put my cursor in the first foo
(without selecting the whole word first) and hit CtrlD, I get
and if I continue hitting CtrlD for several more times, I get
so only the "individual words" are selected - foo_bar
is not, nor is foobar
. However, if I set word_separators
to .\()"':,;<>~!@#%^&*|+=[]{}`~?$
(removing -
and /
) I get the same results when hitting CtrlD repeatedly:
-
and /
are still treated as word separators, even though I removed them from the list. If I add _
to the word_separators
list, the results are the same, and only one obvious conclusion can be drawn: word_separators
is ignored by CtrlD (find_under_expand
).
However, the word_separators
list IS used when double-clicking to select a word. With the list like this: .\()"'_:,;<>~!@#%^&*|+=[]{}`~?$
(missing -
and /
, but with _
), double-clicking on foo
in each word in turn gives the following:
Interestingly, double-clicking on the very first foo
gives
indicating that the "box" highlighting of similar selections is not paying attention to word_separators
.
When using Find -> Find...
to search, word_separators
is ignored. When nothing is selected and foo
is entered into the search box (non-regex search), the following matches are highlighted:
This is the same regardless of whether -
, /
, and/or /
are in word_separators
or not.
If "Whole Word"
is set in the options, the results are a bit different, but again they don't change regardless of whether -
, /
, and/or /
are in word_separators
:
TL;DR
So, the conclusion is that word_separators
is only in effect when double-clicking to select a word. Using a Find
dialog or CtrlD (find_under_expand
command) relies on some internal separator list, which apparently can't be altered (see my answer here).
A little bit more
Some info I forgot to add earlier: word_separators
is also used by some plugins for various sorts of things, such as creating/modifying/otherwise working with selections, doing programmable completions, find and replace, and other sorts of stuff.