Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
777 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

.net - C# Constructor - why default constructor is generated by compiler only if there is no constructor, instead of when there is no default constructor

According to MSDN's design guide for constructors,

"If you don’t explicitly declare any constructors on a type, many languages (such as C#) will automatically add a public default constructor. (Abstract classes get a protected constructor.) Adding a parameterized constructor to a class prevents the compiler from adding the default constructor. This often causes accidental breaking changes."

Why not:

"If you don’t explicitly declare any default constructors on a type, many languages (such as C#) will automatically add a public default constructor. (Abstract classes get a protected constructor.)"

What is the reason behind this?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Because not all classes should be constructed parameterless.

Consider a class that is designed to implement the interface between your application and a file on disk. It would be very inconvenient having to handle the case where the object is constructed without specifying which file to manage.

As such, since the main point of creating a non-static class is that you want to create objects of it, you're spared having to add an empty parameterless constructor if that is all you want to have.

Once you start adding constructors at all, then the automagic is disabled and no default constructor will be provided.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...