Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
1.0k views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

python - Get indices of top N values in 2D numpy ndarray or numpy matrix

I have an array of N-dimensional vectors.

data = np.array([[5, 6, 1], [2, 0, 8], [4, 9, 3]])

In [1]: data
Out[1]:
array([[5, 6, 1],
       [2, 0, 8],
       [4, 9, 3]])

I'm using sklearn's pairwise_distances function to compute a matrix of distance values. Note that this matrix is symmetric about the diagonal.

dists = pairwise_distances(data)

In [2]: dists
Out[2]:
array([[  0.        ,   9.69535971,   3.74165739],
       [  9.69535971,   0.        ,  10.48808848],
       [  3.74165739,  10.48808848,   0.        ]])

I need the indices corresponding to the top N values in this matrix dists, because these indices will correspond the pairwise indices in data that represent vectors with the greatest distances between them.

I have tried doing np.argmax(np.max(distances, axis=1)) to get the index of the max value in each row, and np.argmax(np.max(distances, axis=0)) to get the index of the max value in each column, but note that:

In [3]: np.argmax(np.max(dists, axis=1))
Out[3]: 1

In [4]: np.argmax(np.max(dists, axis=0))
Out[4]: 1

and:

In [5]: dists[1, 1]
Out[5]: 0.0

Because the matrix is symmetric about the diagonal, and because argmax returns the first index it finds with the max value, I end up with the cell in the diagonal in the row and column matching where the max values are stored, instead of the row and column of the top values themselves.

At this point I'm sure I could write some more code to find the values I'm looking for, but surely there is an easier way to do what I'm trying to do. So I have two questions that are more or less equivalent:

How can I find the indices corresponding to the top N values in a matrix, or , how can I find the vectors with the top N pairwise distances from an array of vectors?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

I'd ravel, argsort, and then unravel. I'm not claiming this is the best way, only that it's the first way that occurred to me, and I'll probably delete it in shame after someone posts something more obvious. :-)

That said (choosing the top 2 values, arbitrarily):

In [73]: dists = sklearn.metrics.pairwise_distances(data)

In [74]: dists[np.tril_indices_from(dists, -1)] = 0

In [75]: dists
Out[75]: 
array([[  0.        ,   9.69535971,   3.74165739],
       [  0.        ,   0.        ,  10.48808848],
       [  0.        ,   0.        ,   0.        ]])

In [76]: ii = np.unravel_index(np.argsort(dists.ravel())[-2:], dists.shape)

In [77]: ii
Out[77]: (array([0, 1]), array([1, 2]))

In [78]: dists[ii]
Out[78]: array([  9.69535971,  10.48808848])

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...