Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
512 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

java - @Produces collection in JAXRS / RestEasy

I found some strange behaviour that I cannot understand.

I have tested 4 similar examples:

1

@GET
@Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
public Response produce() {
    List<Book> books = Arrays
            .asList(new Book[] { 
                    new Book("aaa", "AAA", "12345"), 
                    new Book("bbb", "BBB", "09876") 
                    });
    return Response.ok(books).build();
}

2

@GET
@Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
public List<Book> produce() {
    List<Book> books = Arrays
            .asList(new Book[] { 
                    new Book("aaa", "AAA", "12345"), 
                    new Book("bbb", "BBB", "09876") 
                    });
    return books;
}

3

@GET
@Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_XML)
public List<Book> produce() {
    List<Book> books = Arrays
            .asList(new Book[] { 
                    new Book("aaa", "AAA", "12345"), 
                    new Book("bbb", "BBB", "09876") 
                    });
    return books;
}

4

@GET
@Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_XML)
public Response produce() {
    List<Book> books = Arrays
            .asList(new Book[] { 
                    new Book("aaa", "AAA", "12345"), 
                    new Book("bbb", "BBB", "09876") 
                    });
    return Response.ok(books).build();
}

Everything works in #1, #2, #3 but 4th example throws:

Could not find MessageBodyWriter for response object of type: java.util.Arrays$ArrayList of media type: application/xml.

I run it on Wildfly 9 and I wonder if it is related to RestEasy or JaxRS in general? I know that I can fix it by wrapping collection in GenericEntity, but I don't understand this inconsistent behaviour.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

The problem is the missing of type information. This is required for JAXB, which handles the XML serialization.

1 and 2 works because Jackson is being used for JSON, and it generally doesn't need to know type information as it just introspects properties.

3 works because type information is known through the method return type.

4 doesn't work because there is no type information. It's is erased by type erasure. That's where GenericEntity comes to the rescue. It stores the type information.

GenericEntity

Normally type erasure removes generic type information such that a Response instance that contains, e.g., an entity of type List<String> appears to contain a raw List<?> at runtime. When the generic type is required to select a suitable MessageBodyWriter, this class may be used to wrap the entity and capture its generic type.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...