Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
442 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

python - TF slice_input_producer not keeping tensors in sync

I'm reading images into my TF network, but I also need the associated labels along with them.

So I tried to follow this answer, but the labels that are output don't actually match the images that I'm getting in every batch.

The names of my images are in the format dir/3.jpg, so I just extract the label from the image file name.

truth_filenames_np = ...
truth_filenames_tf = tf.convert_to_tensor(truth_filenames_np)

# get the labels
labels = [f.rsplit("/", 1)[1] for f in truth_filenames_np]

labels_tf = tf.convert_to_tensor(labels)

# *** This line should make sure both input tensors are synced (from my limited understanding)
# My list is also already shuffled, so I set shuffle=False
truth_image_name, truth_label = tf.train.slice_input_producer([truth_filenames_tf, labels_tf], shuffle=False)


truth_image_value = tf.read_file(truth_image_name)
truth_image = tf.image.decode_jpeg(truth_image_value)
truth_image.set_shape([IMAGE_DIM, IMAGE_DIM, 3])
truth_image = tf.cast(truth_image, tf.float32)
truth_image = truth_image/255.0

# Another key step, where I batch them together
truth_images_batch, truth_label_batch = tf.train.batch([truth_image, truth_label], batch_size=mb_size)


with tf.Session() as sess:
    sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer())

    coord = tf.train.Coordinator()
    threads = tf.train.start_queue_runners(coord=coord)

    for i in range(epochs):
        print "Epoch ", i
        X_truth_batch = truth_images_batch.eval()
        X_label_batch = truth_label_batch.eval()

        # Here I display all the images in this batch, and then I check which file numbers they actually are. 
        # BUT, the images that are displayed don't correspond with what is printed by X_label_batch!
        print X_label_batch
        plot_batch(X_truth_batch)



    coord.request_stop()
    coord.join(threads)

Am I doing something wrong, or does the slice_input_producer not actually ensure that its input tensors are synced?

Aside:

I also noticed that when I get a batch from tf.train.batch, the elements in the batch are adjacent to each other in the original list I gave it, but the batch order isn't in the original order. Example: If my data is ["dir/1.jpg", "dir/2.jpg", "dir/3.jpg", "dir/4.jpg", "dir/5.jpg, "dir/6.jpg"], then I may get the batch (with batch_size=2) ["dir/3.jpg", "dir/4.jpg"], then batch ["dir/1.jpg", "dir/2.jpg"], and then the last one. So this makes it hard to even just use a FIFO queue for the labels since the order won't match the batch order.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Here is a complete runnable example that reproduces the problem:

import tensorflow as tf

truth_filenames_np = ['dir/%d.jpg' % j for j in range(66)]
truth_filenames_tf = tf.convert_to_tensor(truth_filenames_np)
# get the labels
labels = [f.rsplit("/", 1)[1] for f in truth_filenames_np]
labels_tf = tf.convert_to_tensor(labels)

# My list is also already shuffled, so I set shuffle=False
truth_image_name, truth_label = tf.train.slice_input_producer(
    [truth_filenames_tf, labels_tf], shuffle=False)

# # Another key step, where I batch them together
# truth_images_batch, truth_label_batch = tf.train.batch(
#     [truth_image_name, truth_label], batch_size=11)

epochs = 7

with tf.Session() as sess:
    sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer())
    coord = tf.train.Coordinator()
    threads = tf.train.start_queue_runners(coord=coord)
    for i in range(epochs):
        print("Epoch ", i)
        X_truth_batch = truth_image_name.eval()
        X_label_batch = truth_label.eval()
        # Here I display all the images in this batch, and then I check
        # which file numbers they actually are.
        # BUT, the images that are displayed don't correspond with what is
        # printed by X_label_batch!
        print(X_truth_batch)
        print(X_label_batch)
    coord.request_stop()
    coord.join(threads)

What this prints is:

Epoch  0
b'dir/0.jpg'
b'1.jpg'
Epoch  1
b'dir/2.jpg'
b'3.jpg'
Epoch  2
b'dir/4.jpg'
b'5.jpg'
Epoch  3
b'dir/6.jpg'
b'7.jpg'
Epoch  4
b'dir/8.jpg'
b'9.jpg'
Epoch  5
b'dir/10.jpg'
b'11.jpg'
Epoch  6
b'dir/12.jpg'
b'13.jpg'

So basically each eval call runs the operation another time ! Adding the batching does not make a difference to that - just prints batches (the first 11 filenames followed by the next 11 labels and so on)

The workaround I see is:

for i in range(epochs):
    print("Epoch ", i)
    pair = tf.convert_to_tensor([truth_image_name, truth_label]).eval()
    print(pair[0])
    print(pair[1])

which correctly prints:

Epoch  0
b'dir/0.jpg'
b'0.jpg'
Epoch  1
b'dir/1.jpg'
b'1.jpg'
# ...

but does nothing for the violation of the principle of the least surprise.

EDIT: yet another way of doing it:

import tensorflow as tf

truth_filenames_np = ['dir/%d.jpg' % j for j in range(66)]
truth_filenames_tf = tf.convert_to_tensor(truth_filenames_np)
labels = [f.rsplit("/", 1)[1] for f in truth_filenames_np]
labels_tf = tf.convert_to_tensor(labels)
truth_image_name, truth_label = tf.train.slice_input_producer(
    [truth_filenames_tf, labels_tf], shuffle=False)
epochs = 7
with tf.Session() as sess:
    sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer())
    tf.train.start_queue_runners(sess=sess)
    for i in range(epochs):
        print("Epoch ", i)
        X_truth_batch, X_label_batch = sess.run(
            [truth_image_name, truth_label])
        print(X_truth_batch)
        print(X_label_batch)

That's a much better way as tf.convert_to_tensor and co only accept tensors of same type/shape etc.

Note that I removed the coordinator for simplicity, which however results in a warning:

W c:f_jenkinshomeworkspace elease-windevicecpuoswindowsensorflowcorekernelsqueue_base.cc:294] _0_input_producer/input_producer/fraction_of_32_full/fraction_of_32_full: Skipping cancelled enqueue attempt with queue not closed

See this


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...