You cannot negate a pattern (as far as I know), and your first solution
using if/else
looks fine to me, the intention of the code is clearly
visible.
A switch statement would be an alternative:
switch enumType {
case .SomeEnum(3) where myInt == 3:
break // I don't need this case
default:
// This is the case I need
// ...
}
With regard to your remark
Also, guard expects me to return from the function.
that is not entirely true. You are expected to leave the current scope.
So this would compile and work as expected:
repeat {
guard case .SomeEnum(3) = enumType where myInt == 3 else {
// This is the case I need
// ...
break
}
} while false
but I would not consider that a better solution.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…