Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
1.1k views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

reactjs - Typescript React: Union type for props does not display error when providing excess properties

I am trying to use a union type for the props of a React component

type Props =
  | {
      type: "string"
      value: string
    }
  | {
      type: "number"
      value: number
    }
  | {
      type: "none"
    }

class DynamicProps extends React.Component<Props> {
  render() {
    return null
  }
}

// Ok
const string_jsx = <DynamicProps type="string" value="hello" />

// Error as expected, value should be a string
const string_jsx_bad = <DynamicProps type="string" value={5} />

// Ok
const number_jsx = <DynamicProps type="number" value={5} />

// Error as expcted value should be a number
const number_jsx_bad = <DynamicProps type="number" value="hello" />

// Error as expected, invalid isn't a property on any of the unioned types
const extra = <DynamicProps type="string" value="extra" invalid="what" />

// No error? There should be no value when type="none"
const none_jsx = <DynamicProps type="none" value="This should be an error?" />

// Ok, seems like value has become optional
const none2_jsx = <DynamicProps type="none" />

// Error as expected, value is not present. Value doesn't seem to be made optional all the time
const required = <DynamicProps type="string" />

It seems to partially work as depending on the type prop the valid props will change. However, while extra properties that do not appear on any of the types in the union will be an error, it seems that a type that appears in at least one of the unioned types but does not belong based on the discriminant property will not be an error.

I'm not sure why this is the case. Is it an anti-pattern to be using union types as the props for react components?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

The problem has to do with excess property checks when unions are involved. You can read this answer here to a similar question. The gist of it is that excess property checks for unions allows any key of any member to be present on the object. We can get around this by introducing extra members of type never to make sure that the object with excess properties in not wrongly compatible with a particular member:

type Props =
| {
    type: "string"
    value: string
    }
| {
    type: "number"
    value: number
    }
| {
    type: "none"
    }

type UnionKeys<T> = T extends any ? keyof T : never;
type StrictUnionHelper<T, TAll> = T extends any ? T & Partial<Record<Exclude<UnionKeys<TAll>, keyof T>, never>> : never;
type StrictUnion<T> = StrictUnionHelper<T, T>

class DynamicProps extends React.Component<StrictUnion<Props>> {
    render() {
        return null
    }
}
// error now
const none_jsx = <DynamicProps type="none" value="This should be an error?" />

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...