Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
880 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c - Is comparing to a pointer one element past the end of an array well-defined?

I learned by this question that incrementing a NULL pointer or incrementing past the end of an array isn't well-defined behavior:

int* pointer = 0;
pointer++;

int a[3];
int* pointer2 = &a[0];
pointer2 += 4; 

But what If the pointer pointing to a invalid place is only used for comparison and memory at his location is never accessed?

Example:

void exampleFunction(int arrayLen, char** strArray)
{
    for(char** str = strArray; str < strArray + arrayLen; str++) //or even str < &strArray[arrayLen]
    {
        //here *str is always a pointer to the first char of my string
    }
}

Here I compare my pointer to a pointer one element past the end of the array. Is this well-defined behavior?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Comparing to a pointer one step past the end of an array is well defined. However, your pointer and pointer2 examples are undefined, even if you do literally nothing with those pointers.

A pointer may point to one element past the end of the array. That pointer may not be dereferenced (otherwise that would be undefined behavior) but it can be compared to another pointer within the array.

Section 6.5.6 of the C standard says the following regarding pointer addition (emphasis added):

8 If both the pointer operand and the result point to elements of the same array object, or one past the last element of the array object, the evaluation shall not produce an overflow; otherwise, the behavior is undefined. If the result points one past the last element of the array object, it shall not be used as the operand of a unary * operator that is evaluated.

Section 6.5.8 says the following regarding pointer comparisons (emphasis added):

5 When two pointers are compared, the result depends on the relative locations in the address space of the objects pointed to. If two pointers to object types both point to the same object, or both point one past the last element of the same array object, they compare equal. If the objects pointed to are members of the same aggregate object, pointers to structure members declared later compare greater than pointers to members declared earlier in the structure, and pointers to array elements with larger subscript values compare greater than pointers to elements of the same array with lower subscript values. All pointers to members of the same union object compare equal. If the expression P points to an element of an array object and the expression Q points to the last element of the same array object, the pointer expression Q+1 compares greater than P. In all other cases, the behavior is undefined.

In the case of pointer1, it starts out pointing to NULL. Incrementing this pointer invokes undefined behavior because it don't point to a valid object.

For pointer2, it is increased by 4, putting it two elements past the end of the array, not one, so this is again undefined behavior. Had it been increased by 3, the behavior would be well defined.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...