Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
586 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

python - Is there a difference between "== False" and "is not" when checking for an empty string?

I have read elsewhere on stackoverflow that the most elegant way to check for an empty string in Python (e.g. let's say it's a string called response) is to do:

if not response:
    # do some stuff 

The reason being that strings can evaluate to boolean objects.

So my question is, does the below code say the same thing?

if response == False:
    # do some stuff
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Is there a difference? Yes: one works, and the other doesn't.

if response == False is only true if the actual value of response is False. For an empty string, that is not the case.

if not response, on the other hand, verifies if response is falsey; that is, it is one of the values that Python accepts as false in a boolean context, which includes None, False, the empty string, the empty list, and so on. It is equivalent to if bool(response) == False.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...