I sometimes, but rarely, use naked code blocks to limit scope. For example, take the following code:
double bedroomTemperature = ReadTemperature(Room.Bedroom);
database.Store(Room.Bedroom, bedroomTemperature);
double bathroomTemperature = ReadTemperature(Room.Bathroom);
database.Store(Room.Bedroom, bedroomTemperature);
The code looks fine at first glance, but contains a subtle copy-pasta error. In the database we have stored the bedroom temperature for both readings. If it had been written as:
{
double bedroomTemperature = ReadTemperature(Room.Bedroom);
database.Store(Room.Bedroom, bedroomTemperature);
}
{
double bathroomTemperature = ReadTemperature(Room.Bathroom);
database.Store(Room.Bedroom, bedroomTemperature);
}
Then the compiler (or even IDE if it is intelligent enough) would have spotted this.
However, 90% of the time the code can be refactored to make the naked blocks unnecessary, e.g. the above code would be better written as a loop or two calls to a method that reads and stores the temperature:
foreach (Room room in [] { Room.Bedroom, Room.Bathroom })
{
double temperature = ReadTemperature(room);
database.Store(room, temperature);
}
Naked blocks are useful on occasion though.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…