Normal ways would be Integer.toString(i)
or String.valueOf(i)
.
(正常的方式是Integer.toString(i)
或String.valueOf(i)
。)
The concatenation will work, but it is unconventional and could be a bad smell as it suggests the author doesn't know about the two methods above (what else might they not know?).
(串联可以工作,但它是非常规的,可能会产生难闻的气味,因为这表明作者不了解上述两种方法(他们可能还不知道什么?)。)
Java has special support for the + operator when used with strings (see the documentation ) which translates the code you posted into:
(当与字符串一起使用时,Java对+运算符有特殊的支持(请参阅文档 ),它将您发布的代码转换为:)
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
sb.append("");
sb.append(i);
String strI = sb.toString();
at compile-time.
(在编译时。)
It's slightly less efficient ( sb.append()
ends up calling Integer.getChars()
, which is what Integer.toString()
would've done anyway), but it works. (它的效率稍微低一些( sb.append()
最终调用Integer.getChars()
,无论如何Integer.toString()
都会这样做),但是它可以工作。)
To answer Grodriguez's comment: ** No, the compiler doesn't optimise out the empty string in this case - look:
(要回答Grodriguez的评论:**不,在这种情况下,编译器不会优化空字符串-请看:)
simon@lucifer:~$ cat TestClass.java
public class TestClass {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int i = 5;
String strI = "" + i;
}
}
simon@lucifer:~$ javac TestClass.java && javap -c TestClass
Compiled from "TestClass.java"
public class TestClass extends java.lang.Object{
public TestClass();
Code:
0: aload_0
1: invokespecial #1; //Method java/lang/Object."<init>":()V
4: return
public static void main(java.lang.String[]);
Code:
0: iconst_5
1: istore_1
Initialise the StringBuilder:
(初始化StringBuilder:)
2: new #2; //class java/lang/StringBuilder
5: dup
6: invokespecial #3; //Method java/lang/StringBuilder."<init>":()V
Append the empty string:
(追加空字符串:)
9: ldc #4; //String
11: invokevirtual #5; //Method java/lang/StringBuilder.append:
(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder;
Append the integer:
(追加整数:)
14: iload_1
15: invokevirtual #6; //Method java/lang/StringBuilder.append:
(I)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder;
Extract the final string:
(提取最终字符串:)
18: invokevirtual #7; //Method java/lang/StringBuilder.toString:
()Ljava/lang/String;
21: astore_2
22: return
}
There's a proposal and ongoing work to change this behaviour, targetted for JDK 9.
(针对JDK 9,有一项建议和正在进行的工作来改变这种行为。)