Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
443 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

dax - Aggregate on measure in powerbi?

So I have some measures created, with an example table such as:

Fruit Fruit Measure Value
banana sweetness 90
banana sweetness 80
banana tartness 15
banana tartness 20
peach sweetness 70
peach sweetness 65
peach tartness 35
peach tartness 40
apple sweetness 65
apple sweetness 60
apple tartness 30
apple tartness 25
kiwi sweetness 20
kiwi sweetness 15
kiwi tartness 85
kiwi tartness 90
question from:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66052626/aggregate-on-measure-in-powerbi

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

There can be 2 approaches, depending on the granularity of your data. They can be visualised like this. The first measure (Measure one) always shows your desired result, regardless, if you put Fruit Measure in the visual or not. The second one does not and allows you to see it at the fruit level, as well as at the measurement level.

enter image description here

Measure one =
CALCULATE (
    DIVIDE (
        SUMX (
            VALUES ( Fruit[Fruit Measure] ),
            DIVIDE (
                CALCULATE ( SUM ( Fruit[Value] ) ),
                CALCULATE ( SUM ( Fruit[Value] ), ALLSELECTED ( Fruit[Fruit] ) )
            )
        ),
        COUNTROWS ( VALUES ( Fruit[Fruit Measure] ) )
    ),
    ALLSELECTED ( Fruit[Fruit Measure] )
)

Measure two =
DIVIDE (
    SUMX (
        VALUES ( Fruit[Fruit Measure] ),
        DIVIDE (
            CALCULATE ( SUM ( Fruit[Value] ) ),
            CALCULATE ( SUM ( Fruit[Value] ), ALLSELECTED ( Fruit[Fruit] ) )
        )
    ),
    COUNTROWS ( VALUES ( Fruit[Fruit Measure] ) )
)

I decided to use COUNTROWS() (instead of simple division by 2) , to make it work with any number of Fruit Measure values.

In the second measure, VALUES ( Fruit[Fruit Measure] ) could be put in a variable, as it's used twice, to make it look less repetitive.

My recommendation would be to go with something like Measure two, as it's more flexible (and quite elegant), but it depends on you reporting requirements.

EDIT

Actually, Measure two is unnecessarily convoluted. It should be simplified like this:

Measure three =
AVERAGEX (
    VALUES ( Fruit[Fruit Measure] ),
    DIVIDE (
        CALCULATE ( SUM ( Fruit[Value] ) ),
        CALCULATE ( SUM ( Fruit[Value] ), ALLSELECTED ( Fruit[Fruit] ) )
    )
)

Apologies for that.

enter image description here

And just to answer your question about SUM(Table[PercentageofColTotal_SumPerFruit]) giving an error, you can use measures in SUMX, e.g. SUMX(Table, [PercentageofColTotal_SumPerFruit]). Note, I'm not refering to correctness of the result of this operation in this context.

EDIT2

Here is another take on Measure one based on the comment. This time it calculates values based on all fruit, regardless of slicer selection / filtering.

Measure one = 
CALCULATE (
    AVERAGEX (
        VALUES ( Fruit[Fruit Measure] ),
        DIVIDE (
            CALCULATE ( SUM ( Fruit[Value] ) ),
            CALCULATE ( SUM ( Fruit[Value] ), ALL ( Fruit[Fruit] ) )
        )
    ),
    ALL ( Fruit[Fruit Measure] )
)

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

56.9k users

...