Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
135 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

loops - When to use "while" or "for" in Python

I am finding problems in when I should use a while loop or a for loop in Python. It looks like people prefer using a for loop (less code lines?). Is there any specific situation which I should use one or the other? Is it a matter of personal preference? The codes I have read so far made me think there are big differences between them.

question from:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/920645/when-to-use-while-or-for-in-python

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Yes, there is a huge difference between while and for.

The for statement iterates through a collection or iterable object or generator function.

The while statement simply loops until a condition is False.

It isn't preference. It's a question of what your data structures are.

Often, we represent the values we want to process as a range (an actual list), or xrange (which generates the values). This gives us a data structure tailor-made for the for statement.

Generally, however, we have a ready-made collection: a set, tuple, list, map or even a string is already an iterable collection, so we simply use a for loop.

In a few cases, we might want some functional-programming processing done for us, in which case we can apply that transformation as part of iteration. The sorted and enumerate functions apply a transformation on an iterable that fits naturally with the for statement.

If you don't have a tidy data structure to iterate through, or you don't have a generator function that drives your processing, you must use while.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...