When to use SQL sub-queries versus a standard join?

Question

I am working on rewriting some poorly written SQL queries and they are over-utilizing sub-queries. I am looking for best-practices regarding the use of sub-queries.

Any help would be appreciated.

question from:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4799820/when-to-use-sql-sub-queries-versus-a-standard-join

Answer 1

Subqueries are usually fine unless they are dependent subqueries (also known as correlated subqueries). If you are only using independent subqueries and they are using appropriate indexes then they should run quickly. If you have a dependent subquery you might run into performance problems because a dependent subquery typically needs to be run once for each row in the outer query. So if your outer query has 1000 rows, the subquery will be run 1000 times. On the other hand an independent subquery typically only needs to be evaluated once.

If you're not sure what is meant by a subquery being dependent or independent here's a rule of thumb - if you can take the subquery, remove it from its context, run it, and get a result set then it's an independent subquery.

If you get a syntax error because it refers to some tables outside of the subquery then its a dependent subquery.

The general rule of course has a few exceptions. For example:

• Many optimizers can take a dependent subquery and find a way to run it efficiently as a JOIN. For example an NOT EXISTS query might result in an ANTI JOIN query plan, so it will not necessarily be any slower than writing the query with a JOIN.
• MySQL has a bug where an independent subquery inside an IN expression is incorrectly identified as a dependent subquery and so a suboptimal query plan is used. This is apparently fixed in the very newest versions of MySQL.

If performance is an issue then measure your specific queries and see what works best for you.