I have a function literal
{case QualifiedType(preds, ty) =>
t.ty = ty ;
Some((emptyEqualityConstraintSet,preds)) }
Which results in an error message
missing parameter type for expanded function The argument types of an anonymous function
must be fully known. (SLS 8.5) Expected type was:
? => Option[(Typer.this.EqualityConstraintSet, Typer.this.TypeRelationSet)]
I looked in SLS 8.5, but didn't find an explanation.
If I expand the function myself to
{(qt : QualifiedType) =>
qt match {case QualifiedType(preds, ty) =>
t.ty = ty ;
Some((emptyEqualityConstraintSet,preds)) }}
the error goes away.
(a) Why is this an error?
(b) What can I do to fix it?
I tried the obvious fix, which was to add : QualifiedType
between the pattern and the =>, but this is a syntax error.
One thing I noticed is that the context makes a difference. If I use the function literal as an argument to a function declared as expecting a QualifiedType => B
, there is no error. But if I use it as an argument to a function expecting an A => B
, there is an error. I expect that what is going on here is that, as the pattern could conceivably be applied to an object whose type is a supertype of QualifiedType, the compiler is not willing to assign the obvious type without assurance that the function won't be applied to anything that isn't a QualifiedType. Really what I'd like is to be able to write {QualifiedType( preds, ty) => ...}
and have it mean the same thing as Haskell's QualifiedType(preds,ty) -> ...
.
question from:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12869251/the-argument-types-of-an-anonymous-function-must-be-fully-known-sls-8-5 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…