Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
143 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c# - Proper way to implement IXmlSerializable?

Once a programmer decides to implement IXmlSerializable, what are the rules and best practices for implementing it? I've heard that GetSchema() should return null and ReadXml should move to the next element before returning. Is this true? And what about WriteXml - should it write a root element for the object or is it assumed that the root is already written? How should child objects be treated and written?

Here's a sample of what I have now. I'll update it as I get good responses.

public class MyCalendar : IXmlSerializable
{
    private string _name;
    private bool _enabled;
    private Color _color;
    private List<MyEvent> _events = new List<MyEvent>();


    public XmlSchema GetSchema() { return null; }

    public void ReadXml(XmlReader reader)
    {
        if (reader.MoveToContent() == XmlNodeType.Element && reader.LocalName == "MyCalendar")
        {
            _name    = reader["Name"];
            _enabled = Boolean.Parse(reader["Enabled"]);
            _color   = Color.FromArgb(Int32.Parse(reader["Color"]));

            if (reader.ReadToDescendant("MyEvent"))
            {
                while (reader.MoveToContent() == XmlNodeType.Element && reader.LocalName == "MyEvent")
                {
                    MyEvent evt = new MyEvent();
                    evt.ReadXml(reader);
                    _events.Add(evt);
                }
            }
            reader.Read();
        }
    }

    public void WriteXml(XmlWriter writer)
    {
        writer.WriteAttributeString("Name",    _name);
        writer.WriteAttributeString("Enabled", _enabled.ToString());
        writer.WriteAttributeString("Color",   _color.ToArgb().ToString());

        foreach (MyEvent evt in _events)
        {
            writer.WriteStartElement("MyEvent");
            evt.WriteXml(writer);
            writer.WriteEndElement();
        }
    }
}

public class MyEvent : IXmlSerializable
{
    private string _title;
    private DateTime _start;
    private DateTime _stop;


    public XmlSchema GetSchema() { return null; }

    public void ReadXml(XmlReader reader)
    {
        if (reader.MoveToContent() == XmlNodeType.Element && reader.LocalName == "MyEvent")
        {
            _title = reader["Title"];
            _start = DateTime.FromBinary(Int64.Parse(reader["Start"]));
            _stop  = DateTime.FromBinary(Int64.Parse(reader["Stop"]));
            reader.Read();
        }
    }

    public void WriteXml(XmlWriter writer)
    {
        writer.WriteAttributeString("Title", _title);
        writer.WriteAttributeString("Start", _start.ToBinary().ToString());
        writer.WriteAttributeString("Stop",  _stop.ToBinary().ToString());
    }
}

Corresponding Sample XML

<MyCalendar Name="Master Plan" Enabled="True" Color="-14069085">
    <MyEvent Title="Write Code" Start="-8589241828854775808" Stop="-8589241756854775808" />
    <MyEvent Title="???" Start="-8589241828854775808" Stop="-8589241756854775808" />
    <MyEvent Title="Profit!" Start="-8589247048854775808" Stop="-8589246976854775808" />
</MyCalendar>
Question&Answers:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Yes, GetSchema() should return null.

IXmlSerializable.GetSchema Method This method is reserved and should not be used. When implementing the IXmlSerializable interface, you should return a null reference (Nothing in Visual Basic) from this method, and instead, if specifying a custom schema is required, apply the XmlSchemaProviderAttribute to the class.

For both read and write, the object element has already been written, so you don't need to add an outer element in write. For example, you can just start reading/writing attributes in the two.

For write:

The WriteXml implementation you provide should write out the XML representation of the object. The framework writes a wrapper element and positions the XML writer after its start. Your implementation may write its contents, including child elements. The framework then closes the wrapper element.

And for read:

The ReadXml method must reconstitute your object using the information that was written by the WriteXml method.

When this method is called, the reader is positioned at the start of the element that wraps the information for your type. That is, just before the start tag that indicates the beginning of a serialized object. When this method returns, it must have read the entire element from beginning to end, including all of its contents. Unlike the WriteXml method, the framework does not handle the wrapper element automatically. Your implementation must do so. Failing to observe these positioning rules may cause code to generate unexpected runtime exceptions or corrupt data.

I'll agree that is a little unclear, but it boils down to "it is your job to Read() the end-element tag of the wrapper".


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...