Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
288 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

java - Android AsyncTask API deprecating in Android 11.What are the alternatives?

Google is deprecating Android AsyncTask API in Android 11 and suggesting to use java.util.concurrent instead. you can check out the commit here

 *
 * @deprecated Use the standard <code>java.util.concurrent</code> or
 *   <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/libraries/architecture/coroutines">
 *   Kotlin concurrency utilities</a> instead.
 */
@Deprecated
public abstract class AsyncTask<Params, Progress, Result> {

If you’re maintaining an older codebase with asynchronous tasks in Android, you’re likely going to have to change it in future. My question is that what should be proper replacement of the code snippet shown below using java.util.concurrent. It is a static inner class of an Activity. I am looking for something that will work with minSdkVersion 16

private static class LongRunningTask extends AsyncTask<String, Void, MyPojo> {
        private static final String TAG = MyActivity.LongRunningTask.class.getSimpleName();
        private WeakReference<MyActivity> activityReference;

        LongRunningTask(MyActivity context) {
            activityReference = new WeakReference<>(context);
        }

        @Override
        protected MyPojo doInBackground(String... params) {
            // Some long running task
            
        }

        @Override
        protected void onPostExecute(MyPojo data) {

            MyActivity activity = activityReference.get();
            activity.progressBar.setVisibility(View.GONE);
            populateData(activity, data) ;
        }     


    }
Question&Answers:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)
private WeakReference<MyActivity> activityReference;

Good riddance that it's deprecated, because the WeakReference<Context> was always a hack, and not a proper solution.

Now people will have the opportunity to sanitize their code.


AsyncTask<String, Void, MyPojo> 

Based on this code, Progress is actually not needed, and there is a String input + MyPojo output.

This is actually quite easy to accomplish without any use of AsyncTask.

public class TaskRunner {
    private final Executor executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(); // change according to your requirements
    private final Handler handler = new Handler(Looper.getMainLooper());

    public interface Callback<R> {
        void onComplete(R result);
    }

    public <R> void executeAsync(Callable<R> callable, Callback<R> callback) {
        executor.execute(() -> {
            final R result = callable.call();
            handler.post(() -> {
                callback.onComplete(result);
            });
        });
    }
}

How to pass in the String? Like so:

class LongRunningTask implements Callable<MyPojo> {
    private final String input;

    public LongRunningTask(String input) {
        this.input = input;
    }

    @Override
    public MyPojo call() {
        // Some long running task
        return myPojo;
    }
}

And

// in ViewModel
taskRunner.executeAsync(new LongRunningTask(input), (data) -> {
    // MyActivity activity = activityReference.get();
    // activity.progressBar.setVisibility(View.GONE);
    // populateData(activity, data) ;

    loadingLiveData.setValue(false);
    dataLiveData.setValue(data);
});

// in Activity
@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
    super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);

    setContentView(R.layout.main_activity);

    viewModel = ViewModelProviders.of(this).get(MyViewModel.class);
    viewModel.loadingLiveData.observe(this, (loading) -> {
        if(loading) {
            progressBar.setVisibility(View.VISIBLE);
        } else {
            progressBar.setVisibility(View.GONE);
        }
    });

    viewModel.dataLiveData.observe(this, (data) -> {
        populateData(data);
    }); 
}

This example used a single-threaded pool which is good for DB writes (or serialized network requests), but if you want something for DB reads or multiple requests, you can consider the following Executor configuration:

private static final Executor THREAD_POOL_EXECUTOR =
        new ThreadPoolExecutor(5, 128, 1,
                TimeUnit.SECONDS, new LinkedBlockingQueue<Runnable>());

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...