Suppose I have the following declared:
section .bss
buffer resb 1
And these instructions follow in section .text
:
mov al, 5 ; mov-immediate
mov [buffer], al ; store
mov bl, [buffer] ; load
mov cl, buffer ; mov-immediate?
Am I correct in understanding that bl will contain the value 5, and cl will contain the memory address of the variable buffer
?
I am confused about the differences between
- moving an immediate into a register,
- moving a register into an immediate (what goes in, the data or the address?) and
- moving an immediate into a register without the brackets
- For example,
mov cl, buffer
vs mov cl, [buffer]
UPDATE: After reading the responses, I suppose the following summary is accurate:
mov edi, array
puts the memory address of the zeroth array index in edi
. i.e. the label address.
mov byte [edi], 3
puts the VALUE 3 into the zeroth index of the array
- after
add edi, 3
, edi
now contains the memory address of the 3rd index of the array
mov al, [array]
loads the DATA at the zeroth index into al
.
mov al, [array+3]
loads the DATA at the third index into al
.
mov [al], [array]
is invalid because x86 can't encode 2 explicit memory operands, and because al
is only 8 bits and can't be used even in a 16-bit addressing mode. Referencing the contents of a memory location. (x86 addressing modes)
mov array, 3
is invalid, because you can't say "Hey, I don't like the offset at which array
is stored, so I'll call it 3". An immediate can only be a source operand.
mov byte [array], 3
puts the value 3 into the zeroth index (first byte) of the array. The byte
specifier is needed to avoid ambiguity between byte/word/dword for instructions with memory, immediate operands. That would be an assemble-time error (ambiguous operand size) otherwise.
Please mention if any of these is false. (editor's note: I fixed syntax errors / ambiguities so the valid ones actually are valid NASM syntax. And linked other Q&As for details)
Question&Answers:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…