Off the top of my head, no.
I think the best you could do is something like this:
def loop(f,n):
for i in xrange(n): f()
loop(lambda: <insert expression here>, 5)
But I think you can just live with the extra i
variable.
Here is the option to use the _
variable, which in reality, is just another variable.
for _ in range(n):
do_something()
Note that _
is assigned the last result that returned in an interactive python session:
>>> 1+2
3
>>> _
3
For this reason, I would not use it in this manner. I am unaware of any idiom as mentioned by Ryan. It can mess up your interpreter.
>>> for _ in xrange(10): pass
...
>>> _
9
>>> 1+2
3
>>> _
9
And according to Python grammar, it is an acceptable variable name:
identifier ::= (letter|"_") (letter | digit | "_")*
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…