reference - Cannot borrow as mutable because it is also borrowed as immutable

Question

I am learning Rust and I don't quite get why this is not working.

#[derive(Debug)]
struct Node {
    value: String,
}

#[derive(Debug)]
pub struct Graph {
    nodes: Vec<Box<Node>>,
}

fn mk_node(value: String) -> Node {
    Node { value }
}

pub fn mk_graph() -> Graph {
    Graph { nodes: vec![] }
}

impl Graph {
    fn add_node(&mut self, value: String) {
        if let None = self.nodes.iter().position(|node| node.value == value) {
            let node = Box::new(mk_node(value));
            self.nodes.push(node);
        };
    }

    fn get_node_by_value(&self, value: &str) -> Option<&Node> {
        match self.nodes.iter().position(|node| node.value == *value) {
            None => None,
            Some(idx) => self.nodes.get(idx).map(|n| &**n),
        }
    }
}


#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use super::*;

    #[test]
    fn some_test() {
        let mut graph = mk_graph();

        graph.add_node("source".to_string());
        graph.add_node("destination".to_string());

        let source = graph.get_node_by_value("source").unwrap();
        let dest = graph.get_node_by_value("destination").unwrap();

        graph.add_node("destination".to_string());
    }
}

(playground)

This has the error

error[E0502]: cannot borrow `graph` as mutable because it is also borrowed as immutable
  --> src/main.rs:50:9
   |
47 |         let source = graph.get_node_by_value("source").unwrap();
   |                      ----- immutable borrow occurs here
...
50 |         graph.add_node("destination".to_string());
   |         ^^^^^ mutable borrow occurs here
51 |     }
   |     - immutable borrow ends here

This example from Programming Rust is quite similar to what I have but it works:

pub struct Queue {
    older: Vec<char>,   // older elements, eldest last.
    younger: Vec<char>, // younger elements, youngest last.
}

impl Queue {
    /// Push a character onto the back of a queue.
    pub fn push(&mut self, c: char) {
        self.younger.push(c);
    }

    /// Pop a character off the front of a queue. Return `Some(c)` if there /// was a character to pop, or `None` if the queue was empty.
    pub fn pop(&mut self) -> Option<char> {
        if self.older.is_empty() {
            if self.younger.is_empty() {
                return None;
            }

            // Bring the elements in younger over to older, and put them in // the promised order.
            use std::mem::swap;
            swap(&mut self.older, &mut self.younger);
            self.older.reverse();
        }

        // Now older is guaranteed to have something. Vec's pop method // already returns an Option, so we're set.
        self.older.pop()
    }

    pub fn split(self) -> (Vec<char>, Vec<char>) {
        (self.older, self.younger)
    }
}

pub fn main() {
    let mut q = Queue {
        older: Vec::new(),
        younger: Vec::new(),
    };

    q.push('P');
    q.push('D');

    assert_eq!(q.pop(), Some('P'));
    q.push('X');

    let (older, younger) = q.split(); // q is now uninitialized.
    assert_eq!(older, vec!['D']);
    assert_eq!(younger, vec!['X']);
}

Answer 1

A MCVE of your problem can be reduced to this:

fn main() {
    let mut items = vec![1];
    let item = items.last();
    items.push(2);
}

error[E0502]: cannot borrow `items` as mutable because it is also borrowed as immutable
 --> src/main.rs:4:5
  |
3 |     let item = items.last();
  |                ----- immutable borrow occurs here
4 |     items.push(2);
  |     ^^^^^ mutable borrow occurs here
5 | }
  | - immutable borrow ends here

You are encountering the exact problem that Rust was designed to prevent. You have a reference pointing into the vector and are attempting to insert into the vector. Doing so might require that the memory of the vector be reallocated, invalidating any existing references. If that happened and you used the value in item, you'd be accessing uninitialized memory, potentially causing a crash.

In this particular case, you aren't actually using item (or source, in the original) so you could just... not call that line. I assume you did that for some reason, so you could wrap the references in a block so that they go away before you try to mutate the value again:

fn main() {
    let mut items = vec![1];
    {
        let item = items.last();
    }
    items.push(2);
}

This trick is no longer needed in Rust 2018 because non-lexical lifetimes have been implemented, but the underlying restriction still remain — you cannot have a mutable reference while there are other references to the same thing. This is one of the rules of references covered in The Rust Programming Language. A modified example that still does not work with NLL:

let mut items = vec![1];
let item = items.last();
items.push(2);
println!("{:?}", item);

In other cases, you can copy or clone the value in the vector. The item will no longer be a reference and you can modify the vector as you see fit:

fn main() {
    let mut items = vec![1];
    let item = items.last().cloned();
    items.push(2);
}

If your type isn't cloneable, you can transform it into a reference-counted value (such as Rc or Arc) which can then be cloned. You may or may not also need to use interior mutability:

struct NonClone;

use std::rc::Rc;

fn main() {
    let mut items = vec![Rc::new(NonClone)];
    let item = items.last().cloned();
    items.push(Rc::new(NonClone));
}

this example from Programming Rust is quite similar

No, it's not, seeing as how it doesn't use references at all.

See also

• Cannot borrow `*x` as mutable because it is also borrowed as immutable
• Pushing something into a vector depending on its last element
• Why doesn't the lifetime of a mutable borrow end when the function call is complete?
• How should I restructure my graph code to avoid an "Cannot borrow variable as mutable more than once at a time" error?
• Why do I get the error "cannot borrow x as mutable more than once"?
• Why does Rust want to borrow a variable as mutable more than once at a time?