Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
297 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

python how to pad numpy array with zeros

I want to know how I can pad a 2D numpy array with zeros using python 2.6.6 with numpy version 1.5.0. But these are my limitations. Therefore I cannot use np.pad. For example, I want to pad a with zeros such that its shape matches b. The reason why I want to do this is so I can do:

b-a

such that

>>> a
array([[ 1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.],
       [ 1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.],
       [ 1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.]])
>>> b
array([[ 3.,  3.,  3.,  3.,  3.,  3.],
       [ 3.,  3.,  3.,  3.,  3.,  3.],
       [ 3.,  3.,  3.,  3.,  3.,  3.],
       [ 3.,  3.,  3.,  3.,  3.,  3.]])
>>> c
array([[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0],
       [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0],
       [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0],
       [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]])

The only way I can think of doing this is appending, however this seems pretty ugly. is there a cleaner solution possibly using b.shape?

Edit, Thank you to MSeiferts answer. I had to clean it up a bit, and this is what I got:

def pad(array, reference_shape, offsets):
    """
    array: Array to be padded
    reference_shape: tuple of size of ndarray to create
    offsets: list of offsets (number of elements must be equal to the dimension of the array)
    will throw a ValueError if offsets is too big and the reference_shape cannot handle the offsets
    """

    # Create an array of zeros with the reference shape
    result = np.zeros(reference_shape)
    # Create a list of slices from offset to offset + shape in each dimension
    insertHere = [slice(offsets[dim], offsets[dim] + array.shape[dim]) for dim in range(array.ndim)]
    # Insert the array in the result at the specified offsets
    result[insertHere] = array
    return result
Question&Answers:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

NumPy 1.7.0 (when numpy.pad was added) is pretty old now (it was released in 2013) so even though the question asked for a way without using that function I thought it could be useful to know how that could be achieved using numpy.pad.

It's actually pretty simple:

>>> import numpy as np
>>> a = np.array([[ 1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.],
...               [ 1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.],
...               [ 1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.]])
>>> np.pad(a, [(0, 1), (0, 1)], mode='constant')
array([[ 1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  0.],
       [ 1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  0.],
       [ 1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  0.],
       [ 0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.]])

In this case I used that 0 is the default value for mode='constant'. But it could also be specified by passing it in explicitly:

>>> np.pad(a, [(0, 1), (0, 1)], mode='constant', constant_values=0)
array([[ 1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  0.],
       [ 1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  0.],
       [ 1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  0.],
       [ 0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.]])

Just in case the second argument ([(0, 1), (0, 1)]) seems confusing: Each list item (in this case tuple) corresponds to a dimension and item therein represents the padding before (first element) and after (second element). So:

[(0, 1), (0, 1)]
         ^^^^^^------ padding for second dimension
 ^^^^^^-------------- padding for first dimension

  ^------------------ no padding at the beginning of the first axis
     ^--------------- pad with one "value" at the end of the first axis.

In this case the padding for the first and second axis are identical, so one could also just pass in the 2-tuple:

>>> np.pad(a, (0, 1), mode='constant')
array([[ 1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  0.],
       [ 1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  0.],
       [ 1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  0.],
       [ 0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.]])

In case the padding before and after is identical one could even omit the tuple (not applicable in this case though):

>>> np.pad(a, 1, mode='constant')
array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.],
       [ 0.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  0.],
       [ 0.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  0.],
       [ 0.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  0.],
       [ 0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.]])

Or if the padding before and after is identical but different for the axis, you could also omit the second argument in the inner tuples:

>>> np.pad(a, [(1, ), (2, )], mode='constant')
array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.],
       [ 0.,  0.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  0.,  0.],
       [ 0.,  0.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  0.,  0.],
       [ 0.,  0.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  0.,  0.],
       [ 0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.]])

However I tend to prefer to always use the explicit one, because it's just to easy to make mistakes (when NumPys expectations differ from your intentions):

>>> np.pad(a, [1, 2], mode='constant')
array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.],
       [ 0.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  0.,  0.],
       [ 0.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  0.,  0.],
       [ 0.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  1.,  0.,  0.],
       [ 0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.],
       [ 0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.,  0.]])

Here NumPy thinks you wanted to pad all axis with 1 element before and 2 elements after each axis! Even if you intended it to pad with 1 element in axis 1 and 2 elements for axis 2.

I used lists of tuples for the padding, note that this is just "my convention", you could also use lists of lists or tuples of tuples, or even tuples of arrays. NumPy just checks the length of the argument (or if it doesn't have a length) and the length of each item (or if it has a length)!


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...