If you are using template literals only with placeholders (e.g. `Hello ${person.name}`
) like in the question's example, then the result is the same as just concatenating strings. Subjectively it looks better and is easier to read, especially for multi-line strings or strings containing both '
and "
since you don't have to escape those characters any more.
Readability is a great feature, but the most interesting thing about templates are Tagged template literals:
let person = {name: 'John Smith'};
let tag = (strArr, name) => strArr[0] + name.toUpperCase() + strArr[1];
tag `My name is ${person.name}!` // Output: My name is JOHN SMITH!
In the third line of this example, a function named tag
is called. The content of the template string is split into multiple variables, that you can access in the arguments of the tag
function: literal sections (in this example the value of strArr[0]
is My name is
and the value of strArr[1]
is !
) and substitutions (John Smith
). The template literal will be evaluated to whatever the tag
function returns.
The ECMAScript wiki lists some possible use cases, like automatically escaping or encoding input, or localization. You could create a tag function named msg
that looks up the literal parts like My name is
and substitutes them with translations into the current locale's language, for example into German:
console.log(msg`My name is ${person.name}.`) // Output: Mein Name ist John Smith.
The value returned by the tag function doesn't even have to be a string. You could create a tag function named $
which evaluates the string and uses it as a query selector to return a collection of DOM nodes, like in this example:
$`a.${className}[href=~'//${domain}/']`
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…