Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
461 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

Typescript Discriminated Union allows invalid state

I am trying to use a Typescript Discriminated Union to model a rather common scenario when loading data asynchronously:

type LoadingState = { isLoading: true; }
type SuccessState = { isLoading: false; isSuccess: true; }
type ErrorState =   { isLoading: false; isSuccess: false; errorMessage: string; }

type State = LoadingState | SuccessState | ErrorState;

According to my understanding, this should limit the allowed combinations of values according to the type definitions. However, the type system is happy to accept the following combination:

const testState: State = {
    isLoading: true,
    isSuccess: true,
    errorMessage: "Error!"
}

I expect an error here. Is there something I am missing or in some way misusing the type definitions?

Question&Answers:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

This is an issue with the way excess property checks work on unions. If an object literal is assigned to a variable of union type, a property will not be marked as excess if it is present on any of the union members. If we don't consider excess properties to be an error (and except for object literals they are not considered an error), the object literal you specified could be an instance of LoadingState (an instance with isLoading set to true as mandated and a couple of excess properties).

To get around this undesired behavior we can add properties to LoadingState to make your object literal incompatible with LoadingState

type LoadingState = { isLoading: true; isSuccess?: undefined }
type SuccessState = { isLoading: false; isSuccess: true; }
type ErrorState =   { isLoading: false; isSuccess: false; errorMessage: string; }

type State = LoadingState | SuccessState | ErrorState;

const testState: State = { // error
    isLoading: true,
    isSuccess: true,
    errorMessage: "Error!"
}

We could even create a type that would ensure such member will be added

type LoadingState = { isLoading: true; }
type SuccessState = { isLoading: false; isSuccess: true; }
type ErrorState =   { isLoading: false; isSuccess: false; errorMessage: string; }

type UnionKeys<T> = T extends T ? keyof T : never;
type StrictUnionHelper<T, TAll> = T extends any ? T & Partial<Record<Exclude<UnionKeys<TAll>, keyof T>, undefined>> : never;
type StrictUnion<T> = StrictUnionHelper<T, T>

type State = StrictUnion< LoadingState | SuccessState | ErrorState>

const testState: State = { // error
    isLoading: true,
    isSuccess: true,
    errorMessage: "Error!"
}

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...