RestTemplate
is thread safe (emphasis added):
Conceptually, it is very similar to the JdbcTemplate
, JmsTemplate
, and the various other templates found in the Spring Framework and other portfolio projects. This means, for instance, that the RestTemplate
is thread-safe once constructed
Objects of the RestTemplate
class do not change any of their state information to process HTTP: the class is an instance of the Strategy design pattern, rather than being like a connection object. With no state information, there is no possibility of different threads corrupting or racing state information if they share a RestTemplate
object. This is why it is possible for threads to share these objects.
If you examine the source code of RestTemplate
you will see that it does not use synchronized
methods or volatile
fields to provide thread-safety after construction of the object. So it is not safe to modify a RestTemplate
object after construction. In particular, it is unsafe to add a message converter.
To provide it with a list of message converters you must do one of the following:
- Use the
RestTemplate(List<HttpMessageConverter<?>> messageConverters)
constructor. As the internal list of messageConverters
is final
, this safely publishes the list of message converters.
- Use the
setMessageConverters(List<HttpMessageConverter<?>> messageConverters)
mutator and then safely-publish the changed RestTemplate
object. Using a Spring bean definition that has a <property name="messageConverters"><list>...
does this, as the bean will be safely published by the thread setting up the container in most practical use cases.
- Use
List.add
on the reference returned by getMessageConverters()
and then safely publish the changed RestTemplate
object. However, the documentation for RestTemplate
does not explicitly state that it returns a reference that can be used to alter the list of message converters. The current implementation does, but possibly the implementation might be changed to return a Collections.unmodifiableList
or a copy of the list. So it might be better not to change it this way.
Note that the first case is the only means of setting up the message converters when constructing the object, so it is correct to say that it "is thread safe once constructed".
The class is part of the Spring Framework, so in almost all practical cases objects of the class will be set up as part of a Spring Application Context, using the first (dependency injection using a constructor) or second (dependency injection using a setter) methods, and so would be guaranteed to be safely published to multiple threads.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…