From this sort of table:
| id | in | value | valueMax |
| 1 | 1 | 10 | 25 |
| 1 | 2 | 11 | 25 |
| 1 | 3 | 12 | 25 |
| 2 | 1 | 20 | 35 |
| 2 | 2 | 21 | 35 |
| 2 | 3 | 22 | 35 |
Is it posible to make a select that returns this:
| id | value1 | valueMax1 | value2 | valueMax2 | value3 | valueMax3 |
| 1 | 10 | 25 | 11 | 25 | 12 | 25 |
| 2 | 20 | 35 | 21 | 35 | 22 | 35 |
So far i've tryed solutions with GROUP_CONCAT, or SELECT inside SELECT, but it's not the result i'm looking for. As per comment i'll show next what i want to happen if an IN = 4 is added.
With new data:
| id | in | value | valueMax |
| 1 | 1 | 10 | 25 |
| 1 | 2 | 11 | 25 |
| 1 | 3 | 12 | 25 |
| 1 | 4 | 13 | 35 |
| 2 | 1 | 20 | 35 |
| 2 | 2 | 21 | 35 |
| 2 | 3 | 22 | 35 |
| 2 | 4 | 23 | 35 |
Result of select:
| id | value1 | valueMax1 | value2 | valueMax2 | value3 | valueMax3 | value4 | valueMax4 |
| 1 | 10 | 25 | 11 | 25 | 12 | 25 | 13 | 35 |
| 2 | 20 | 35 | 21 | 35 | 22 | 35 | 23 | 35 |
NOTE: as an aditional feature, is there anyway to actually get a result like this WITHOUT knowing the exact number of IN values? so, the same query would work on a table with 2 posible values of IN, as well as on a table with 5 posible values.
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…