New answer
As of update 6 within Java 7's lifetime, the behaviour of substring
changed to create a copy - so every String
refers to a char[]
which is not shared with any other object, as far as I'm aware. So at that point, substring()
became an O(n) operation where n is the numbers in the substring.
Old answer: pre-Java 7
Undocumented - but in practice O(1) if you assume no garbage collection is required, etc.
It simply builds a new String
object referring to the same underlying char[]
but with different offset and count values. So the cost is the time taken to perform validation and construct a single new (reasonably small) object. That's O(1) as far as it's sensible to talk about the complexity of operations which can vary in time based on garbage collection, CPU caches etc. In particular, it doesn't directly depend on the length of the original string or the substring.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…