Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
1.6k views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

mongodb - Average Aggregation Queries in Meteor

Ok, still in my toy app, I want to find out the average mileage on a group of car owners' odometers. This is pretty easy on the client but doesn't scale. Right? But on the server, I don't exactly see how to accomplish it.

Questions:

  1. How do you implement something on the server then use it on the client?
  2. How do you use the $avg aggregation function of mongo to leverage its optimized aggregation function?
  3. Or alternatively to (2) how do you do a map/reduce on the server and make it available to the client?

The suggestion by @HubertOG was to use Meteor.call, which makes sense and I did this:

# Client side
Template.mileage.average_miles = ->
  answer = null
  Meteor.call "average_mileage", (error, result) ->
    console.log "got average mileage result #{result}"
    answer = result
  console.log "but wait, answer = #{answer}"
  answer

# Server side
Meteor.methods average_mileage: ->
  console.log "server mileage called"
  total = count = 0
  r = Mileage.find({}).forEach (mileage) ->
    total += mileage.mileage
    count += 1
  console.log "server about to return #{total / count}"
  total / count

That would seem to work fine, but it doesn't because as near as I can tell Meteor.call is an asynchronous call and answer will always be a null return. Handling stuff on the server seems like a common enough use case that I must have just overlooked something. What would that be?

Thanks!

Question&Answers:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

As of Meteor 0.6.5, the collection API doesn't support aggregation queries yet because there's no (straightforward) way to do live updates on them. However, you can still write them yourself, and make them available in a Meteor.publish, although the result will be static. In my opinion, doing it this way is still preferable because you can merge multiple aggregations and use the client-side collection API.

Meteor.publish("someAggregation", function (args) {
    var sub = this;
    // This works for Meteor 0.6.5
    var db = MongoInternals.defaultRemoteCollectionDriver().mongo.db;

    // Your arguments to Mongo's aggregation. Make these however you want.
    var pipeline = [
        { $match: doSomethingWith(args) },
        { $group: {
            _id: whatWeAreGroupingWith(args),
            count: { $sum: 1 }
        }}
    ];

    db.collection("server_collection_name").aggregate(        
        pipeline,
        // Need to wrap the callback so it gets called in a Fiber.
        Meteor.bindEnvironment(
            function(err, result) {
                // Add each of the results to the subscription.
                _.each(result, function(e) {
                    // Generate a random disposable id for aggregated documents
                    sub.added("client_collection_name", Random.id(), {
                        key: e._id.somethingOfInterest,                        
                        count: e.count
                    });
                });
                sub.ready();
            },
            function(error) {
                Meteor._debug( "Error doing aggregation: " + error);
            }
        )
    );
});

The above is an example grouping/count aggregation. Some things of note:

  • When you do this, you'll naturally be doing an aggregation on server_collection_name and pushing the results to a different collection called client_collection_name.
  • This subscription isn't going to be live, and will probably be updated whenever the arguments change, so we use a really simple loop that just pushes all the results out.
  • The results of the aggregation don't have Mongo ObjectIDs, so we generate some arbitrary ones of our own.
  • The callback to the aggregation needs to be wrapped in a Fiber. I use Meteor.bindEnvironment here but one can also use a Future for more low-level control.

If you start combining the results of publications like these, you'll need to carefully consider how the randomly generated ids impact the merge box. However, a straightforward implementation of this is just a standard database query, except it is more convenient to use with Meteor APIs client-side.

TL;DR version: Almost anytime you are pushing data out from the server, a publish is preferable to a method.

For more information about different ways to do aggregation, check out this post.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...