Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
1.2k views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

entity framework - MVC3 and Code First Migrations - "model backing the 'blah' context has changed since the database was created"

I started off my project by using Entity Framework Code First. When I was ready I uploaded my database and code to my host provider. Everything worked.

I need to add a new field to one of my classes and I don't want to loose the data in the database. Thus, I tried following some blog posts about using Code First Migrations. I did the following:

  1. I backed up my remote (production) database.
  2. I attached this database locally
  3. I added the property to my class
  4. PM> Enable-Migrations
  5. PM> Add-Migration AddSortOrderToCar
  6. PM> Update-Database
  7. At this point I created a .bak file of the local database and then used that file to 'restore' to the remote one.
  8. Lastly, I published the code to the remote site.

When I visit the site I get the following error message: The model backing the 'blahblah' context has changed since the database was created. Consider using Code First Migrations to update the database.

What am I doing wrong?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

From my experience that suggests that migration table is out of sync (even if your data isn't), and that's been part of the db schema now (since 4.3 I think - under system tables).

There could be many reasons and ways to experience that error , but most of the time...

The problematic part is some combination of manually backing/restoring the full database with code changes alongside - I'm not entirely certain as to why always.

In short, even if Db-s are the same migration table data might not be - and hash comparison may fail (still full restore sounds like good enough - but you have 'two sides').


What works for me is to use
Update-Database -Script

That creates a script with a 'migration difference',
which you can manually apply as an SQL script on the target server database (and you should get the right migration table rows inserted etc.).

If that still doesn't work - you can still do two things...

  1. Remove the migration table (target - under system tables) - as per http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2012/02/09/ef-4-3-automatic-migrations-walkthrough.aspx comments in there - that should fail back to previous behavior and if you're certain that your Db-s are the same - it's just going to 'trust you',

  2. As a last resort I used - make a Update-Database -Script of the full schema (e.g. by initializing an empty db which should force a 'full script'),
    find the INSERT INTO [__MigrationHistory] records,
    just run those, insert them into the database,
    and make sure that your databases - and code match,

that should make things run in sync again.

(disclaimer: this is not a bullet proof to work at all times, you may need to try a few things given your local scenarios - but should get you in sync)


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...