You are storing unbound staticmethod
objects in a dictionary. Such objects (as well as classmethod
objects, functions and property
objects) are only bound through the descriptor protocol, by accessing the name as an attribute on the class or an instance. Directly accessing the staticmethod
objects in the class body is not an attribute access.
Either create the dictionary after creating the class (so you access them as attributes), or bind explicitly, or extract the original function before storing them in the dictionary.
Note that 'binding' for staticmethod
objects merely means that the context is merely ignored; a bound staticmethod
returns the underlying function unchanged.
So your options are to unindent the dictionary and trigger the descriptor protocol by using attributes:
class A(object):
@staticmethod
def open():
return 123
@staticmethod
def proccess():
return 456
A.switch = {
1: A.open,
2: A.proccess,
}
or to bind explicitly, passing in a dummy context (which will be ignored anyway):
class A(object):
@staticmethod
def open():
return 123
@staticmethod
def proccess():
return 456
switch = {
1: open.__get__(object),
2: proccess.__get__(object),
}
or access the underlying function directly with the __func__
attribute:
class A(object):
@staticmethod
def open():
return 123
@staticmethod
def proccess():
return 456
switch = {
1: open.__func__,
2: proccess.__func__,
}
However, if all you are trying to do is provide a namespace for a bunch of functions, then you should not use a class object in the first place. Put the functions in a module. That way you don't have to use staticmethod
decorators in the first place and don't have to unwrap them again.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…