This could work better:
Where FK.DT = cast(getdate() + 1 - datepart(day, getdate()) as date)
Unless you are running with trace flag 4199 on there is a bug that affects the cardinality estimates. At the time of writing
SELECT DATEADD(m, DATEDIFF(m, getdate(), 0), 0),
DATEADD(m, DATEDIFF(m, 0, getdate()), 0)
Returns
+-------------------------+-------------------------+
| 1786-06-01 00:00:00.000 | 2013-08-01 00:00:00.000 |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+
The bug is that the predicate in the question uses the first date rather than the second when deriving the cardinality estimates. So for the following setup.
CREATE TABLE FK
(
ID INT IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY,
DT DATE,
Filler CHAR(1000) NULL,
UNIQUE (DT,ID)
)
INSERT INTO FK (DT)
SELECT TOP (1000000) DATEADD(m, DATEDIFF(m, getdate(), 0), 0)
FROM master..spt_values o1, master..spt_values o2
UNION ALL
SELECT DATEADD(m, DATEDIFF(m, 0, getdate()), 0)
Query 1
SELECT COUNT(Filler)
FROM FK
WHERE FK.DT = CAST(DATEADD(m, DATEDIFF(m, 0, getdate()), 0) AS DATE)
Estimates that the number of matching rows will be 100,000. This is the number that match the date '1786-06-01'
.
But both of the following queries
SELECT COUNT(Filler)
FROM FK
WHERE FK.DT = CAST(GETDATE() + 1 - DATEPART(DAY, GETDATE()) AS DATE)
SELECT COUNT(Filler)
FROM FK
WHERE FK.DT = CAST(DATEADD(m, DATEDIFF(m, 0, getdate()), 0) AS DATE)
OPTION (QUERYTRACEON 4199)
Give this plan
Due to the much more accurate cardinality estimates the plan now just does a single index seek rather than a full scan.