Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
199 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

javascript - Exact time of display: requestAnimationFrame usage and timeline

What I want to achieve is to detect the precise time of when a certain change appeared on the screen (primarily with Google Chrome). For example I show an item using $("xelement").show(); or change it using $("#xelement").text("sth new"); and then I would want to see what the performance.now() was exactly when the change appeared on the user's screen with the given screen repaint. So I'm totally open to any solutions - below I just refer primarily to requestAnimationFrame (rAF) because that is the function that is supposed to help achieve exactly this, only it doesn't seem to; see below.

Basically, as I imagine, rAF should execute everything inside it in about 0-17 ms (whenever the next frame appears on my standard 60 Hz screen). Moreover, the timestamp argument should give the value of the time of this execution (and this value is based on the same DOMHighResTimeStamp measure as performance.now()).

Now here is one of the many tests I made for this: https://jsfiddle.net/gasparl/k5nx7zvh/31/

function item_display() {
    var before = performance.now();
    requestAnimationFrame(function(timest){
        var r_start = performance.now();
        var r_ts = timest;
        console.log("before:", before);
        console.log("RAF callback start:", r_start);
        console.log("RAF stamp:", r_ts);
        console.log("before vs. RAF callback start:", r_start - before);
        console.log("before vs. RAF stamp:", r_ts - before);
        console.log("")
    });
}
setInterval(item_display, Math.floor(Math.random() * (1000 - 500 + 1)) + 500);

What I see in Chrome is: the function inside rAF is executed always within about 0-3 ms (counting from a performance.now() immediately before it), and, what's weirdest, the rAF timestamp is something totally different from what I get with the performance.now() inside the rAF, being usually about 0-17 ms earlier than the performance.now() called before the rAF (but sometimes about 0-1 ms afterwards).

Here is a typical example:

before: 409265.00000001397
RAF callback start: 409266.30000001758
RAF stamp: 409260.832 
before vs. RAF callback start: 1.30000000353902
before vs. RAF stamp: -4.168000013974961 

In Firefox and in IE it is different. In Firefox the "before vs. RAF callback start" is either around 1-3 ms or around 16-17 ms. The "before vs. RAF stamp" is always positive, usually around 0-3 ms, but sometimes anything between 3-17 ms. In IE both differences are almost always around 15-18 ms (positive). These are more or less the same of different PCs. However, when I run it on my phone's Chrome, then, and only then, it seems plausibly correct: "before vs. RAF stamp" randomly around 0-17, and "RAF callback start" always a few ms afterwards.

For more context: This is for an online response-time experiment where users use their own PC (but I typically restrict browser to Chrome, so that's the only browser that really matters to me). I show various items repeatedly, and measure the response time as "from the moment of the display of the element (when the person sees it) to the moment when they press a key", and count an average from the recorded response times for specific items, and then check the difference between certain item types. This also means that it doesn't matter much if the recorded time is always a bit skewed in a direction (e.g. always 3 ms before the actual appearance of the element) as long as this skew is consistent for each display, because only the difference really matters. A 1-2 ms precision would be the ideal, but anything that mitigates the random "refresh rate noise" (0-17 ms) would be nice.

I also gave a try to jQuery.show() callback, but it does not take refresh rate into account: https://jsfiddle.net/gasparl/k5nx7zvh/67/

var r_start;
function shown() {
    r_start = performance.now();
}
function item_display() {
    var before = performance.now();
    $("#stim_id").show(complete = shown())
    var after = performance.now();
    var text = "before: " + before + "<br>callback RT: " + r_start + "<br>after: " + after + "<br>before vs. callback: " + (r_start - before) + "<br>before vs. after: " + (after - r_start)
    console.log("")
    console.log(text)
    $("p").html(text);
    setTimeout(function(){ $("#stim_id").hide(); }, 500);
}
setInterval(item_display, Math.floor(Math.random() * (1000 - 500 + 1)) + 800);

With HTML:

<p><br><br><br><br><br></p>
<span id="stim_id">STIMULUS</span>

The solution (based on Kaiido's answer) along with working display example:

function monkeyPatchRequestPostAnimationFrame() {
  const channel = new MessageChannel();
  const callbacks = [];
  let timestamp = 0;
  let called = false;
  channel.port2.onmessage = e => {
    called = false;
    const toCall = callbacks.slice();
    callbacks.length = 0;
    toCall.forEach(fn => {
      try {
        fn(timestamp);
      } catch (e) {}
    });
  };
  window.requestPostAnimationFrame = function(callback) {
    if (typeof callback !== 'function') {
      throw new TypeError('Argument 1 is not callable');
    }
    callbacks.push(callback);
    if (!called) {
      requestAnimationFrame((time) => {
        timestamp = time;
        channel.port1.postMessage('');
      });
      called = true;
    }
  };
}

if (typeof requestPostAnimationFrame !== 'function') {
  monkeyPatchRequestPostAnimationFrame();
}

function chromeWorkaroundLoop() {
  if (needed) {
    requestAnimationFrame(chromeWorkaroundLoop);
  }
}

// here is how I display items
// includes a 100 ms "warm-up"
function item_display() {
  window.needed = true;
  chromeWorkaroundLoop();
  setTimeout(function() {
    var before = performance.now();
    $("#stim_id").text("Random new text: " + Math.round(Math.random()*1000) + ".");
    $("#stim_id").show();
    // I ask for display above, and get display time below
    requestPostAnimationFrame(function() {
      var rPAF_now = performance.now();
      console.log("before vs. rPAF now:", rPAF_now - before);
      console.log("");
      needed = false;
    });
  }, 100);
}

// below is just running example instances of displaying stuff
function example_loop(count) {
  $("#stim_id").hide();
  setTimeout(function() {
    item_display();
    if (count > 1) {
      example_loop(--count);
    }
  }, Math.floor(Math.random() * (1000 - 500 + 1)) + 500);
}

example_loop(10);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.3/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="stim_id">Any text</div>
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

What you are experiencing is a Chrome bug (and even two).

Basically, when the pool of requestAnimationFrame callbacks is empty, they'll call it directly at the end of the current event loop, without waiting for the actual painting frame as the specs require.

To workaround this bug, you can keep an ever-going requestAnimationFrame loop, but beware this will mark your document as "animated" and will trigger a bunch of side-effects on your page (like forcing a repaint at every screen refresh). So I'm not sure what you are doing, but it's generally not a great idea to do this, and I would rather invite you to run this animation loop only when required.

let needed = true; // set to false when you don't need the rAF loop anymore

function item_display() {
  var before = performance.now();
  requestAnimationFrame(function(timest) {
    var r_start = performance.now();
    var r_ts = timest;
    console.log("before:", before);
    console.log("RAF callback start:", r_start);
    console.log("RAF stamp:", r_ts);
    console.log("before vs. RAF callback start:", r_start - before);
    console.log("before vs. RAF stamp:", r_ts - before);
    console.log("")
    setTimeout(item_display, Math.floor(Math.random() * (1000 - 500 + 1)) + 500);
  });
}
chromeWorkaroundLoop();
item_display();

function chromeWorkaroundLoop() {
  if (needed) {
    requestAnimationFrame(chromeWorkaroundLoop);
  }
};

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...