Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
477 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

windows - Reduce flicker with GDI+ and C++

I'm using GDI+ in a C++/MFC application and I just can't seem to avoid flickering whenever the window is resized.

I have already tried these steps:

  • returned TRUE on OnEraseBkGnd();
  • returned NULL on OnCtlColor();
  • used double buffering according to this code:

void vwView::OnDraw(CDC* pDC) 
{
   CRect rcClient;
   GetClientRect(rcClient);

   Bitmap bmp(rcClient.Width(), rcClient.Height());
   Graphics graphics(&bmp);

   graphics.DrawImage(m_image, rcClient.left, rcClient.top);

   Graphics grph(pDC->m_hDC);
   grph.DrawImage(&bmp, 0, 0);
}

Am I doing something wrong? Or is there another way to achieve this?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

To completely avoid flicker, you would need to complete all drawing in the interval between screen updates. Windows does not provide any easy means of accomplishing this for normal window painting (Vista provides composite drawing via the DWM, but this cannot be relied on even on systems running Vista). Therefore, the best you can do to minimize flicker is to draw everything as quickly as possible (reduce tearing by increasing your chances of completing all drawing within a refresh cycle), and avoid overdraw (drawing part of the screen and then drawing something else over the top: risks presenting user with a partially-drawn screen).

Let's discuss the techniques presented here so far:

  • Do-nothing OnEraseBkgnd(): helps to avoid over-draw by preventing the invalidated area of the window from being filled with the window's background color. Useful when you will be drawing the entire area again during WM_PAINT handling anyway, as in the case of double-buffered drawing... but see Notes on avoiding overdraw by preventing drawing after your WM_PAINT method.

  • Returning NULL for OnCtlColor(): this shouldn't actually do anything... unless you have child controls on your form. In that case, see Notes on avoiding overdraw by preventing drawing after your WM_PAINT method instead.

  • Double buffered drawing: helps to avoid tearing (and potentially overdraw as well), by reducing the actual on-screen drawing to a single BitBLT. May hurt the time needed for drawing though: hardware acceleration cannot be used (although with GDI+, the chances of any hardware-assisted drawing being used are quite slim), an off-screen bitmap must be created and filled for each redraw, and the entire window must be repainted for each redraw. See Notes on efficient double-buffering.

  • Using GDI calls rather than GDI+ for the BitBlt: This is often a good idea - Graphics::DrawImage() can be very slow. I've even found the normal GDI BitBlt() call to be faster on some systems. Play around with this, but only after trying a few other suggestions first.

  • Avoiding window class styles that force a full redraw on each resize (CS_VREDRAW, CS_HREDRAW): This will help, but only if you don't need to redraw the entire window when size changes.

Notes on avoiding overdraw by preventing drawing prior to your WM_PAINT method

When all or a portion of a window is invalidated, it will be erased and repainted. As already noted, you can skip erasing if you plan to repaint the entire invalid area. However, if you are working with a child window, then you must ensure that parent window(s) are not also erasing your area of the screen. The WS_CLIPCHILDREN style should be set on all parent windows - this will prevent the areas occupied by child windows (including your view) from being drawn on.

Notes on avoiding overdraw by preventing drawing after your WM_PAINT method

If you have any child controls hosted on your form, you will want to use the WS_CLIPCHILDREN style to avoid drawing over them (and subsequently being over drawn by them. Be aware, this will impact the speed of the BitBlt routine somewhat.

Notes on efficient double-buffering

Right now, you're creating a new back-buffer image each time the view draws itself. For larger windows, this can represent a significant amount of memory being allocated and released, and will result in significant performance problems. I recommend keeping a dynamically-allocated bitmap in your view object, re-allocating it as needed to match the size of your view.

Note that while the window is being resized, this will result in just as many allocations as the present system, since each new size will require a new back buffer bitmap to be allocated to match it - you can ease the pain somewhat by rounding dimensions up to the next largest multiple of 4, 8, 16, etc., allowing you to avoid re-allocated on each tiny change in size.

Note that, if the size of the window hasn't changed since the last time you rendered into the back buffer, you don't need to re-render it when the window is invalidated - just Blt out the already-rendered image onto the screen.

Also, allocate a bitmap that matches the bit depth of the screen. The constructor for Bitmap you're currently using will default to 32bpp, ARGB-layout; if this doesn't match the screen, then it will have to be converted. Consider using the GDI method CreateCompatibleBitmap() to get a matching bitmap.

Finally... I assume your example code is just that, an illustrative snippet. But, if you are actually doing nothing beyond rendering an existing image onto the screen, then you don't really need to maintain a back buffer at all - just Blt directly from the image (and convert the format of the image ahead of time to match the screen).


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...