Well, I'd expect it's this line that's throwing the exception:
var documentRow = _dsACL.Documents.First(o => o.ID == id)
First()
will throw an exception if it can't find any matching elements. Given that you're testing for null immediately afterwards, it sounds like you want FirstOrDefault()
, which returns the default value for the element type (which is null for reference types) if no matching items are found:
var documentRow = _dsACL.Documents.FirstOrDefault(o => o.ID == id)
Other options to consider in some situations are Single()
(when you believe there's exactly one matching element) and SingleOrDefault()
(when you believe there's exactly one or zero matching elements). I suspect that FirstOrDefault
is the best option in this particular case, but it's worth knowing about the others anyway.
On the other hand, it looks like you might actually be better off with a join here in the first place. If you didn't care that it would do all matches (rather than just the first) you could use:
var query = from target in _lstAcl.Documents
join source in _dsAcl.Document
where source.ID.ToString() equals target.ID
select new { source, target };
foreach (var pair in query)
{
target.Read = source.Read;
target.ReadRule = source.ReadRule;
// etc
}
That's simpler and more efficient IMO.
Even if you do decide to keep the loop, I have a couple of suggestions:
- Get rid of the outer
if
. You don't need it, as if Count is zero the for loop body will never execute
Use exclusive upper bounds in for loops - they're more idiomatic in C#:
for (i = 0; i < _lstAcl.Documents.Count; i++)
Eliminate common subexpressions:
var target = _lstAcl.Documents[i];
// Now use target for the rest of the loop body
Where possible use foreach
instead of for
to start with:
foreach (var target in _lstAcl.Documents)
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…